Is the two-state solution still possible? Is the United States indispensable to an agreement between Israel...

Is the two-state solution still possible? Is the United States indispensable to an agreement between Israel and Palestinian authorities? Are Israel settlements the biggest obstacle to an agreement? Why? (Excerpts from Global Issues: Selections from CQ Researcher - Chapter 2 - Israeli-Palestinian Conflict)

Expert Solution

ANS) Yes, if they both agree.It could be possible,Nonetheless they have to know each other very well in terms they wanted to sorted out.Firstly,there are 3 types US assistance to the palestinians-The first is USAID, the conduit by which the State Department provides aid to countries across the world. The second is the economic support for law and order in the Palestinian Authority.The third is the US support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, or UNRWA.Keeping in Mind US is the largest donor of financial aids to the Palestinians,with this assistance touching near to every aspect of life in the Palestinian Authority itself.But the president has been threatened earlier to end this aid for palestinians, angered by Ramallah’s refusal to cooperate with the US efforts to jump-start Israeli-Palestinian peace talks after he declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel in December.And the Mighty Palestinians wants East Jerusalem to be the capital of their future state.

US is the biggest and real obstacle to peace between israel and palestinian.Israeli settlements are not an obstacle for peace'.That is True to be honest. Yet,Palestinians argue settlements, along with Israeli-only roads, security barriers and military checkpoints, threaten the viability of a two-state solution.Most countries across the world view settlement building on Palestinian land as a violation of international law.Personally i don't think that the settlements are an obstacle for peace, The only obstacle for peace are the palestinians.

Hayet Jeridi answered 3 months ago

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada,...

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico whose purpose is to eliminate tariffs between the countries and promote all aspects of international trade. There are many arguments for and against the treaty. One of the arguments against centers on the fact that Mexican industries do not have to meet the same environmental regulations as industries in the United States and Canada. The U.S. and Canada have intervened in the...

What does the proposed agreement between the United States and the European Union mean for U.S....

What does the proposed agreement between the United States and the European Union mean for U.S. companies selling to the European Union? Will consumers benefit?

NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's....

NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's. This agreement eliminates trade barriers between these countries and allows trade to move freely without tariffs or restrictions. However, there is a downside to this. Look at "in the News" on pg. 782 of the text on jobs relating to NAFTA. How do agricultural workers feel about this agreement? How about construction workers? The comparative advantage in these countries has changed due to NAFTA....

1.The United States still participates in the gold standard since it eliminates exchange rate risk between...

1.The United States still participates in the gold standard since it eliminates exchange rate risk between the dollar and other foreign currencies. True or False 2.The peso appreciated by 4% from the Eurozone point of view. What is the percentage appreciation/depreciation of the euro from the Mexican point of view? Enter your answer in decimal format and round any intermediate steps and for final answer to four decimals (EX: .XXXX).

Is an ounce of prevention still worth a pound of cure in the United States? If...

Is an ounce of prevention still worth a pound of cure in the United States? If not, what is the relative value of prevention for the opioids crisis in comparison with treatment for opioids?

Ethics view on United States leaving the Paris Climate Agreement

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 57% chance of...

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 57% chance of occurring. In State 1, Asset A returns 7.75% and Asset B returns 10.75%. In State 2, Asset A returns -4.10% and Asset B returns -7.10%. A portfolio of just these two assets is invested 53% in Asset A (with Asset B comprising the remainder without any negative weights). What is the standard deviation of the portfolio's returns?

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 43% chance of...

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 43% chance of occurring. In State 1, Asset A returns 9.50% and Asset B returns 12.50%. In State 2, Asset A returns -4.80% and Asset B returns -7.80%. A portfolio of just these two assets is invested 67% in Asset A (with Asset B comprising the remainder without any negative weights). What is the standard deviation of the portfolio's returns? options: 7.66% 7.86% 8.06% 8.26% 8.46%

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 67% chance of...

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 67% chance of occurring. In State 1, Asset A returns 6.50% and Asset B returns 9.50%. In State 2, Asset A returns -3.60% and Asset B returns -6.60%. A portfolio of just these two assets is invested 43% in Asset A (with Asset B comprising the remainder w/o any negative weights). What is the standard deviation of the portfolio's returns?

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 73% chance of...

There are only two possible states of the economy. State 1 has a 73% chance of occurring. In State 1, Asset A returns 5.75% and Asset B returns 8.75%. In State 2, Asset A returns -3.30% and Asset B returns -6.30%. A portfolio of just these two assets is invested 37% in Asset A (with Asset B comprising the remainder without any negative weights). What is the standard deviation of the portfolio's returns? Question 5 options: 5.27% 5.41% 5.55% 5.70%...

Question