In: Operations Management
1. ABC Fabrication has the following aggregate demand requirements and other data for the upcoming four quarters.
| QUARTER | DEMAND |
| 1 | 1400 |
| 2 | 1200 |
| 3 | 1600 |
| 4 | 1500 |
Other information;
| Previous Quarter's output | 1300 units |
| Beginning Inventory | 0 units |
| Stock out cost | $50 per unit |
| Inventory holding cost | $10 per unit at the end of the quarter |
| Hiring workers | $40 per unit |
| Laying off workers | $80 per unit |
| Subcontracting Cost | $60 per unit |
| Unit Cost | $30 per unit |
| Overtime | $15 extra per unit |
Which of the following production plans is least costly?
A. Plan A–chase demand by hiring and layoffs;
B.Plan B–pure level strategy,
C. Plan C–1350 level with the remainder by subcontracting? (Show all your workings)
A. For chase strategy, inventory holding cost and stockout cost is 0 as we are just producing what is required. But we incur some hiring and lay off charges.
Hire units = Production units this quarter - Production unit last quarter (-ve value suggest layoff)
The total cost incurred in 4 quarters is 227210.
| Chase strategy | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Demand | - | 1400 | 1200 | 1600 | 1500 | |
| Production | 1300 | 1400 | 1200 | 1600 | 1500 | |
| Subcontracted | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Inventory on hand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stockout | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hire | - | 100 | 0 | 400 | 0 | |
| Layoff | - | 0 | 200 | 0 | 100 | |
| Production Cost | - | 42000 | 36000 | 48000 | 45000 | |
| Subcontract cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Inventory holding cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stockout cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hiring cost | - | 4000 | 0 | 16000 | 0 | |
| Layoff cost | - | 0 | 16000 | 0 | 8000 | |
| TOTAL COST | 48901 | 54602 | 67603 | 56104 | 227210 |
A. For level strategy, hiring and layoff cost is 0 as we are just producing what is required. But we incur some inventory holding and stock out charges.
Inventory on hand = Production - Demand (-ve value suggest stockout)
The total cost incurred in 4 quarters is 193510.
| Level strategy | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Demand | - | 1400 | 1200 | 1600 | 1500 | |
| Production | 1300 | 1300 | 1300 | 1300 | 1300 | |
| Subcontracted | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Inventory on hand | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stockout | - | 100 | 0 | 200 | 200 | |
| Hire | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Layoff | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Production Cost | - | 39000 | 39000 | 39000 | 39000 | |
| Subcontract cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Inventory holding cost | - | 0 | 1000 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stockout cost | - | 5000 | 0 | 10000 | 10000 | |
| Hiring cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Layoff cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL COST | 46801 | 42602 | 52103 | 52004 | 193510 |
In a level strategy reinforced with subcontracting, we will not incur stockout costs.
Subcontracted units = Demand - Inventory on hand fro last quarter - 1350
The total cost incurred in 4 quarters is 195110.
| 1350 level with rest subcontracted | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Demand | - | 1400 | 1200 | 1600 | 1500 | |
| Production | 1300 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | |
| Subcontracted | - | 50 | 0 | 100 | 150 | |
| Inventory on hand | 0 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stockout | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hire | - | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Layoff | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Production Cost | - | 40500 | 40500 | 40500 | 40500 | |
| Subcontract cost | - | 3000 | 0 | 6000 | 9000 | |
| Inventory holding cost | - | 0 | 1500 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stockout cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hiring cost | - | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Layoff cost | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL COST | 48351 | 44702 | 49553 | 52504 | 195110 |
Hence least cost is involved in level strategy. Option B.