In: Finance
Acme Inc had a total assets turnover of 1.39 and an equity multiplier of 1.75. Although it had net income of $11,000 on $295,000 of sales, a private equity firm thinks it could have had a net income $10,750 greater just by cutting costs. If this is possible, how much greater would be the return on equity? (Hint: DuPont!)
8.47%
8.86%
8.09%
9.27%
8.82%
Asset Turn over =Sales/ Assets = 1.39 => Assets = $ 212,230
Equity Multiplier = Asset / equity = 1.75 => equity = $ 121275.22
Liability = 90,955
| Return on Equity (ROE) | |||||||||
| Total Liabilities | (÷) | Total Equity | (=) | 
  | 
Leverage Ratio | ||||
| $90,955 | $121,275 | 0.75 | |||||||
| Interest Expense | (÷) | Total Liabilities | (=) | 
  | 
AIR | ||||
| $0 | $90,955 | 0.00% | |||||||
| 
 | 
|||||||||
| Return on Assets | (+) | Return on Assets | (-) | Average Interest Rate | (x) | Debt/Equity Ratio | (=) | Return on Equity | |
| 5.18% | 5.18% | 0.00% | 0.75 | 9.070% | |||||
With Increase in Net income to 11000+10500 = 21500
| Return on Equity (ROE) | |||||||||
| Total Liabilities | (÷) | Total Equity | (=) | 
  | 
Leverage Ratio | ||||
| $90,955 | $121,275 | 0.75 | |||||||
| Interest Expense | (÷) | Total Liabilities | (=) | 
  | 
AIR | ||||
| $0 | $90,955 | 0.00% | |||||||
| 
 | 
|||||||||
| Return on Assets | (+) | Return on Assets | (-) | Average Interest Rate | (x) | Debt/Equity Ratio | (=) | Return on Equity | |
| 10.13% | 10.13% | 0.00% | 0.75 | 17.928% | |||||
Change in Return of equity = 17.928% - 9.070% = 8.86%
Option 2 => 8.86%