Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Consider n experiment to test the effect of caffeine on athletic performance. Twenty-five subjects were included...

Consider n experiment to test the effect of caffeine on athletic performance. Twenty-five subjects were included in the study. Each subject was initially given two tests, a swimming, and a running. The subject then consumed caffeine and then repeated the two tests. Score was recorded for each of the four series of tests.

A) Suggest model with appropriate notation.

B) Consider the null hypothesis that consumption of caffeine has no effect on either the mean swim score or the mean running score. State Null and Alternative in your notation and explain how to calculate the test statistic and the distribution of it under the null.

C) Consider the single parameter: the decrease in the mean swim score due to caffeine consumption minus the decrease in the mean running score due to caffeine consumption. Give an expression for this parameter using your notation, and explain how you would construct a 95% confidence interval for the parameter.

Will rate positively

Expert Solution

A)

We can use pairwise t test to each of activities ie swimming, and running and determine we there is effect of caffeine on either of swimming, and running.

B)

Activity: Swimming

Mean of Difference (X_D) = Mean of Swimming with Caffeine - Mean of Swimming without Caffeine

Null and Alternate Hypothesis

H₀: µ_D = 0 (There is no effect of Caffeine on swimming)

H_A: µ_D <> 0 (There is no effect of Caffeine on swimming)

Activity: Running

Mean of Difference (X_D) = Mean of Running with Caffeine - Mean of Running without Caffeine

Also, we will calculate Standard Error of Differences

Alpha = 0.05

Null and Alternate Hypothesis

H₀: µ_D = 0 (There is no effect of Caffeine on Running)

H_A: µ_D <> 0 (There is no effect of Caffeine on Running)

Test Statistic

t = (X_D – 0)/SE

p-value = TDIST(t,25-1,2)

Decision Rule

If p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

Result

Based on p-value we either reject or fail to reject the null Hypothesis

C)

We will calculate

Mean of Difference (X_D) = decrease in the mean swim score due to caffeine consumption - decrease in the mean running score due to caffeine consumption

Also, we will calculate Standard Error (SE) of Differences

At alpha = 0.05

Z_Critical = 1.96

Hence 95% CI of Mean of Difference = X_D +/- 1.96 * SE

orchestra answered 2 years ago

A researcher investigated the effect of caffeine on performance on a test of attention. Twenty people...

A researcher investigated the effect of caffeine on performance on a test of attention. Twenty people were given regular black coffee, twenty people were given espresso, twenty people were given soda, and twenty people were given an energy drink. Afterwards, they were all given tests of attention. What is the 〖df〗within? What is the 〖df〗between? What is the critical value of F for the 0.05 significance level (using Figure 12.6. F-table for use with ANOVA)? 〖df〗within = number of participants...

n a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 36 subjects were treated with...

n a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 36 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.1 and a standard deviation of 1.67 Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 00. What do the results suggest about...

n a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 48 subjects were treated with...

n a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 48 subjects were treated with garlic in a processed tablet form. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 4.8 and a standard deviation of 17.6. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. a)What is the best point estimate of the population mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment? b)Construct a 95%...

n a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 8181 subjects were treated with...

n a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 8181 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.30.3 and a standard deviation of 18.218.2. Use a 0.010.01 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 00. What do the results suggest about...

) In a study of the effects of caffeine on alertness, 32 subjects were randomly assigned...

) In a study of the effects of caffeine on alertness, 32 subjects were randomly assigned to four groups. These groups were C1: wait-list control (no treatment), C2: placebo control, E1: experimental group 1 (mild caffeine treatment) and E2: experimental groups 2 (high caffeine treatment). Several subjects were not able to complete the study, reducing the group n’s to 7, 5, 6, and 3, respectively. The dependent variable scores were performance scores on a visual-motor task requiring alertness. The results...

A researcher is interested in looking at the effect of sleep and caffeine on physical performance....

A researcher is interested in looking at the effect of sleep and caffeine on physical performance. The researcher has each subject perform a series of 6 tests across a number of week. The researcher alters the amount of sleep the subject should receive (8 hours, 6 hours, and 4 hours) while also altering whether they drink coffee in the morning or they do not. These two factors are completely crossed to create the six conditions. Eight subjects were recruited for...

1) In a study of the effects of caffeine on alertness, 32 subjects were randomly assigned...

1) In a study of the effects of caffeine on alertness, 32 subjects were randomly assigned to four groups. These groups were C1: wait-list control (no treatment), C2: placebo control, E1: experimental group 1 (mild caffeine treatment) and E2: experimental groups 2 (high caffeine treatment). Several subjects were not able to complete the study, reducing the group n’s to 7, 5, 6, and 3, respectively. The dependent variable scores were performance scores on a visual-motor task requiring alertness. The results...

Twenty-four subjects were used in a clinical trial in which three factors were applied in a...

Twenty-four subjects were used in a clinical trial in which three factors were applied in a completely randomized 23 arrangement with three replicates for each treatment. The three factors were A, B, and C. The response variable was measured at a subsequent stage and the data were: B1 B2 C1 C2 C1 C2 A1 29 33 30 40 40 44 63 59 56 60 68 58 A2 36 39 37 48 52 52 60 65 59 73 61 68 a)...

To study the effect of caffeine on cognitive ability, a cognitive ability test was administered to...

To study the effect of caffeine on cognitive ability, a cognitive ability test was administered to 8 students under two conditions on different days: Condition A) Without caffeine, and Condition B) after the students enjoyed a pumpkin spice latte. The students were randomized to determine if they did Condition A first or Condition B first (on separate days). The following are the results from the test: Student Condition A Condition B 1 68 69 2 87 88 3 61 65...

(20.30) In a randomized comparative experiment on the effect of color on the performance of a...

(20.30) In a randomized comparative experiment on the effect of color on the performance of a cognitive task, researchers randomly divided 68 subjects (29 males and 39 females ranging in age from 17 to 25 years) into three groups. Participants were asked to solve a series of 6 anagrams. One group was presented with the anagrams on a blue screen; one group saw them on a red screen; and one group had a neutral screen. The time, in seconds, taken...