In: Math
A political candidate wishes to determine if endorsing increased social spending is likely to decrease her popularity (α = .05). She has access to data on the popularity of several other candidates who have endorsed increased spending. The data were available both before and after the candidates announced their positions on the issue. The data are as follows:
Popularity rating |
||
Participant |
Before |
After |
1 |
42 |
43 |
2 |
41 |
45 |
3 |
50 |
56 |
4 |
52 |
54 |
5 |
58 |
65 |
6 |
32 |
29 |
7 |
39 |
46 |
8 |
42 |
48 |
Will we need a one- or two-tailed hypothesis test?
State your null hypothesis
State your alternative hypothesis
Provide the SPSS output for your test and identify (circle or highlight) the t-obtained and the p-value
Did you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?
What can you conclude?
Calculate the 95 confidence interval for the “Before” mean
Calculate Cohens D
We need to use a one-tailed hypothesis test.
Null hypothesis: H0: Endorsing increased social spending is not likely to decrease her popularity.
Alternative hypothesis: Ha: Endorsing increased social spending is likely to decrease her popularity.
H0: µD = 0 versus Ha: µD < 0
Required SPSS output is given as below:
Paired Samples Statistics |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean |
N |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
||
Pair 1 |
Before |
44.5000 |
8 |
8.28079 |
2.92770 |
After |
48.2500 |
8 |
10.60660 |
3.75000 |
Paired Samples Correlations |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
N |
Correlation |
Sig. |
||
Pair 1 |
Before & After |
8 |
.960 |
.000 |
Paired Samples Test |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paired Differences |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
||||||
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
||||||
Lower |
Upper |
||||||||
Pair 1 |
Before - After |
-3.75000 |
3.53553 |
1.25000 |
-6.70578 |
-.79422 |
-3.000 |
7 |
.020 |
Test statistic = t = -3.00
P-value = 0.020
P-value < α = 0.05
So, we reject the null hypothesis
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Endorsing increased social spending is likely to decrease her popularity.
A 95% confidence interval for before mean is given as below:
From given data, we have
Xbar = 44.5
S = 8.280786712
n = 8
df = 7
confidence level = 95%
Critical t value = 2.3646 (by using t-table)
Confidence interval = Xbar ± t*S/sqrt(n)
Confidence interval = 44.5 ± 8.280786712/sqrt(8)
Confidence interval = 44.5 ± 6.9229
Lower limit = 44.5 - 6.9229 = 37.58
Upper limit = 44.5 + 6.9229 = 51.42
Cohen’s D = Dbar/SD = -3.75 / 3.5355 = -1.060670344