In: Finance
b. Wells Printing is considering the purchase of a new printing press. The total installed cost of the press is $2.2 million. This outlay would be partially offset by the sale of an existing press. The old press has zero book value, cost $1 million 10 years ago, and can be sold currently for $1.2 million before taxes. As a result of acquisition of the new press, sales in each of the next 5 years are expected to be $1.6 million higher than with the existing press, but product costs (excluding depreciation) will represent 50% of sales. The new press will not affect the firm’s net working capital requirements. The new press will be depreciated under MACRS, using a 5-year recovery period. The firm is subject to a 40% tax rate. Wells Printing’s cost of capital is 11%. (Note: Assume that the old and the new presses will each have a terminal value of $0 at the end of year 6.) [15 marks]
i. Determine the initial investment required by the new press. [2 marks]
ii) Determine the operating cash flows attributable to the new press. (Note: Be sure to consider the depreciation in year 6.) [6 marks]
Statement showing Depreciation
Year | Opening balance | Depreciation Rates | Depreciation (purchase price x Depreciation rates) |
Closing Balance |
1 | 2200000 | 20.00% | 440000 | 1760000 |
2 | 1760000 | 32.00% | 704000 | 1056000 |
3 | 1056000 | 19.20% | 422400 | 633600 |
4 | 633600 | 11.52% | 253440 | 380160 |
5 | 380160 | 11.52% | 253440 | 126720 |
6 | 126720 | 5.76% | 126720 | 0 |
Statement showing initial cash flow and annual cash flow
Particulars | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Installed cost of new press | -2200000 | ||||||
Sale of existing press =1200000(1-tax rate) =1200000(1-40%) =1200000(0.6) =720000 |
720000 | ||||||
Sales | 1600000 | 1600000 | 1600000 | 1600000 | 1600000 | ||
Prodcut cost(50% of sales) | -800000 | -800000 | -800000 | -800000 | -800000 | ||
Depreciation | -440000 | -704000 | -422400 | -253440 | -253440 | -126720 | |
PBT | 360000 | 96000 | 377600 | 546560 | 546560 | -126720 | |
Tax @ 40% | -144000 | -38400 | -151040 | -218624 | -218624 | 50688 | |
PAT | 216000 | 57600 | 226560 | 327936 | 327936 | -76032 | |
Add: Depreciation | 440000 | 704000 | 422400 | 253440 | 253440 | 126720 | |
Annual cash flow | 656000 | 761600 | 648960 | 581376 | 581376 | 50688 | |
Total cash flow | -1480000 | 656000 | 761600 | 648960 | 581376 | 581376 | 50688 |
Thus Ans
i) Initial investment = 1480000 $
ii) Annual cash flow
Particulars | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Annual cash flow | 656000 | 761600 | 648960 | 581376 | 581376 | 50688 |
iii)
Statement showing cummulative cash flow
Year | Annual cash flow | Cummulative cash flow |
1 | 656000 | 656000 |
2 | 761600 | 1417600 |
3 | 648960 | 2066560 |
4 | 581376 | 2647936 |
5 | 581376 | 3229312 |
6 | 50688 | 3280000 |
Now using interpolation we can find payback period
Year | Cummulative cash flow |
2 | 1417600.00 |
3 | 2066560.00 |
1 | 648960.00 |
? | 62400.00 |
=62400/648960
=0.096
Thus paybacl period = 2+0.096 = 2.096 years
iv) Statement showing NPV
Particulars | Annual cash flow | PVIF @ 11% | PV |
1 | 656000 | 0.9009 | 590990.99 |
2 | 761600 | 0.8116 | 618131.65 |
3 | 648960 | 0.7312 | 474513.96 |
4 | 581376 | 0.6587 | 382970.38 |
5 | 581376 | 0.5935 | 345018.36 |
6 | 50688 | 0.5346 | 27099.87 |
PV of total of cash inflow | 2438725.21 | ||
Less : Initial Investment | 1480000 | ||
NPV | 958725 |
Thus NPV = $ 958725
IRR is rate at which NPV is 0, assume r = 35%
Then NPV
Particulars | Annual cash flow | PVIF @ 35% | PV |
1 | 656000 | 0.7407 | 485925.93 |
2 | 761600 | 0.5487 | 417887.52 |
3 | 648960 | 0.4064 | 263764.67 |
4 | 581376 | 0.3011 | 175033.84 |
5 | 581376 | 0.2230 | 129654.70 |
6 | 50688 | 0.1652 | 8373.41 |
PV of total of cash inflow | 1480640.07 | ||
Less : Initial Investment | 1480000.00 | ||
NPV | 640.07 |
Now assume r = 36%
Now using interpolation we can find IRR
r | NPV |
35% | 640.07 |
36% | -24982.77 |
1% | 25622.83 |
? | 640.07 |
=640.07 / 25622.83
= 0.025%
Thus IRR = 35 + 0.025 = 35.025%
v) new press should be accepted since NPV is positive and IRR is greater than required rate of return