Question

write a good CONCLUSION, on administrative law on canada and mexico. write a good narrative of both countries

Answer 1

A Thumbs Up! Would be really helpful for me. If you have any questions, please leave a comment and I will get back to you as soon as possible.

Canadian Administrative Law is the corporate body that addresses the actions and policies of governments and government agencies in Canada. The corporate body deals mainly with issues of substantive review (establishing and applying a review standard) and procedural integrity (protection of participatory rights). Administrative law deals with the statutes and rules of operation of the government.ADM's powers are primarily governed by laws known as "legislation." The judicial review allows the court to consider the entire decision-making process, including procedures, finding facts, and judicial review laws. Laws that enable or stipulate general law The power of general law is derived from the four original texts of certificates, bans, Mandamus, and Habeas Corpus, known as 'practical and functional approaches'. "The purpose is to determine the amount of review the legislature provides. Administrative law is one of the three basic areas of public law dealing with relationships. The other two between the government and the public are constitutional and criminal administrative law, which are Fair and reasonable enforcement and administration of the Canadian, Administrative law regulates governmental activities in a number of ways According to the Canadian Constitution, elected politicians do not violate the rights and freedoms guaranteed by Canadian law and regulate scheduled legislative activities You can approve any law you like unless you try to do it for different levels of administration.

The Mexican model has repeatedly drafted rules and administrative structures that are unable to rise above the political and social sphere in which the complex phenomenon of corruption is deeply rooted, creating a divide between Mexico's legislative and socio-political development experiences in the war against corruption. These observations can help other countries design anti-corruption tools. Administrative law in Mexico has various anti-corruption mechanisms: constitutional provisions and principles; means the introduction of public service, the law of competencies, and the laws of accountability and responsibility. the creation of the National Anti-Corruption Commission is still being debated in the Mexican Congress. Moreover, there is no political will to fight corruption. Therefore, we are not optimistic about the future of this commission.