Question

In: Operations Management

How has NAFTA affected trade among the U.S., Canada and Mexico? Is NAFTA good for domestic...

How has NAFTA affected trade among the U.S., Canada and Mexico? Is NAFTA good for domestic U.S. and Mexican producers?

Solutions

Expert Solution

NAFTA or North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement signed by the United States, Mexico and Canada in 1992 as a free trade area. It was not well received by all the parties as it removes lower skilled assembly and manufacturing jobs from the Home and transplants them to Mexico where labour costs are much lower.

Region-wise, the patterns of trade exhibit the same picture. There has been a gradual shift away from the traditional markets towards the regions in Mexico and Canada. The reason for this shift may include the growing economies of the two nations.

The progress made in the World Trade Organization in liberating tariffs and non-tariff barriers in many countries is yet another reason. NAFTA was one of the liberalization agreement that has increased trade. There are both winners and losers from this side. It has been observed that its balance of trade with the country U is mainly in labor-intensive manufactured goods.


Related Solutions

Has NAFTA been good for Canada, Mexico, and the US? What changes, if any, should be...
Has NAFTA been good for Canada, Mexico, and the US? What changes, if any, should be made to the agreement, and why?
Has NAFTA been good for Canada, Mexico, and the US? What changes, if any, should be...
Has NAFTA been good for Canada, Mexico, and the US? What changes, if any, should be made to the agreement, and why?
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and...
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and Mexico. decreased had no effect on increased none of the above
Is the new trade agreement negotiated by President Trump with Mexico and Canada to replace NAFTA...
Is the new trade agreement negotiated by President Trump with Mexico and Canada to replace NAFTA more beneficial or more harmful to the United States economy than NAFTA?
2. The U.S., Mexico and Canada recently renegotiated the NAFTA accord, which will now become the...
2. The U.S., Mexico and Canada recently renegotiated the NAFTA accord, which will now become the USMCA. What stage of regional integration is represented by NAFTA or the USMCA? What are the four steps that follow, leading to deeper integration? Explain how the loss of autonomy can work against the advancement of integration at each stage. In Kahler’s article on integration, he questioned the “world of blocs” that supposedly has arisen. What was the main contention in this article about...
Compare the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). How are...
Compare the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). How are they different? Are these changes likely to lead to material changes for Canada?
NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's....
NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's. This agreement eliminates trade barriers between these countries and allows trade to move freely without tariffs or restrictions. However, there is a downside to this. Look at "in the News" on pg. 782 of the text on jobs relating to NAFTA. How do agricultural workers feel about this agreement? How about construction workers? The comparative advantage in these countries has changed due to NAFTA....
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found...
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found that: (A) Canada was not able to increase its exports due to barriers still remaining. (B) Canada had modest gains but was harmed by immigration into the United States from Mexico. (C) Canada had more trade diversion than trade creation and so was harmed overall. (D) Canada had more trade creation than trade diversion and so benefited overall.
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found...
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found that: (A) Canada was not able to increase its exports due to barriers still remaining. (B) Canada had modest gains but was harmed by immigration into the United States from Mexico. (C) Canada had more trade diversion than trade creation and so was harmed overall. (D) Canada had more trade creation than trade diversion and so benefited overall.
With the current trading statistics of U.S. trade with Canada and Mexico, does the opposition to...
With the current trading statistics of U.S. trade with Canada and Mexico, does the opposition to the agrreements seem justified?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT