In: Chemistry
46. |
n order to give rise to more highly complex structures, what capabilities did the first biological molecules have to have |
There are, in fact, multiple theories that suggest how
life may have originated from base organic ingredients. Basicly, it
breaks down into the "RNA first", or the (infinitely more likely
imo) "metabolism first" thoeries. I'm not going to go into detail
when a quick google of wikipedia search can break it down for you
far more easily, but rest assured that we have many, many,
physically sound thoeries for how this may have occured.
So you might ask, how did these organic ingredients come to be?
Well here, the answer is even better. We know, and have
demonstrated in the laboratory, that basic organic compounds can be
spontaneously synthezied in the right conditions, if provided with
an electrical charge.
Next, you posit that random mutations would not result in
adaptation, likening the process to trying to write a computer
program by randomly mashing buttons. Your analogy is essentially
flawed. Most mutations are nuetral or harmful in some way, but
those that are helpful have a higher chance of being passed
on.
Imagine you have a roomfull of thousands of monkeys jamming on
keyboards, and that once they type out, say... twenty characters,
the line is saved and processed by a computer. Every time the
computer finds a line that makes sense, it adds it to a working
database. Only lines that add to the whole in a beneficial way are
stored subsequently.
The computer in my analogy represents natural selection, the
tendency for beneficial traits to be carried over into successive
generations. Like it or not, after enough iterations of this
process, the monkeys will develop a sensible program.