Question

In: Economics

The categorical imperative says _____________ a. Act in a way that honors human rights you would...

The categorical imperative says _____________ a. Act in a way that honors human rights you would will to be universal b. Act to produce the greatest aggregate good c. Act to benefit the greatest number of individuals d. The end justifies the means e. Act in a way that is fair to all

Solutions

Expert Solution

The categorical imperative says (a) Act in way that honors human rights you would will to be universal.If we want people to behave in a particular way,then we should be the first one to practice that behaviour and all people might tend to inculcate the same way and it turns out to be universal.

  • (a)Act in way that honors human rights you would will to be universal:This is right option as categorical imperative depicts that to make a way or behaviour universal,first we should implement that wayof behaviour by considering or honoring human rights so that even surrounding people will obey and tend to practice the same.So,categorical imperative says that to act in way that honors human rights you would will to be universal.Hence,this is considered as correct option.
  • (b)Act to produce the greatest aggregate good:This is incorrect option as categorical imperative doesnot describe the way of producing of goods.Categorical imperative deals with ethics and morals to considered while behaving,inspiring or acting.But,here in this option,it is mentioned about producing greatest aggregate good which is not a part of categorical imperative.Hence,this is incorrect option.
  • (c)Act to benefit the greatest number of individuals:Even this incorrect option.Categorical imperative says that acts are not connected with benefits or results.In categorical imperative,many acts and behaviour are performed without thinking about the result or benefits of others.If results and benefits are a given a thought,acts are not stopped even if there are less benefits.So,categorical imperative do not say to act in such a way to benefit greatest number of individuals.
  • (d)The end justifies the means:This is another wrong option as categorical imperative never depicts that end justifies the means.At times,the end might not be the main mean or thought of acting.There are few situations were ends might be negative,mistake or a wrong and a person's main mean is not to attain that negative end or mistake.So categorical imperative do not say that end justifies the means and it deals with ethics and morals of behaviour.
  • Act in a way that is fair to all:Even this is wrong option.Categorical imperative does not tell to act in a way that is fair to all as satisfying and acting in benefitting way is not possible in all situation. Impressing all and acting in fair way is impossible.Therefore,categorical imperative never says to act in a way that is fair to all but it tells to act in honor and ethical way.

Related Solutions

Can you define Kant's categorical imperative?
Can you define Kant's categorical imperative?
5. According to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative, we must: “So act as to...
5. According to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative, we must: “So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or that of any other, in every case as an end in itself, never as a means only.” Assuming this imperative, it follows that selecting for disability is wrong if it treats the child as a means to satisfying the parents' selfish preferences. answer options: true or false 6.The principle that other people should always be treated...
20) Give 3 examples of clear violations of the ‘human dignity formulation’ of the categorical imperative
20) Give 3 examples of clear violations of the ‘human dignity formulation’ of the categorical imperative
Compare and contrast the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Act. NEED...
Compare and contrast the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Act. NEED ANSWER ASAP.
Explain what Kant meant by "categorical imperative." Explain why you do or do not agree with...
Explain what Kant meant by "categorical imperative." Explain why you do or do not agree with this idea. Describe the relationship between Kant's idea of the categorical imperative and his search for morality. Why does Kant think morality is a duty for all humans?
Benhabib says that international law, including international human rights law, is more or less feckless when...
Benhabib says that international law, including international human rights law, is more or less feckless when it comes to migrant labourers, asylum seekers, and other challenges to the governance of cross-border movements. Do you agree? Disagree? Why? Note that, historically, refugees have had no legal right to sanctuary, only the right to request sanctuary.
Discuss how corporations act as the duty bearer of human rights? Then give two (2) examples...
Discuss how corporations act as the duty bearer of human rights? Then give two (2) examples on how corporations put profit over people?
Why would Congress have power under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to require restaurants and...
Why would Congress have power under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to require restaurants and hotels to not discriminate against interstate travelers on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin? Suppose the Holiday Restaurant near I-80 in Des Moines, Iowa, has a sign that says, “We reserve the right to refuse service to any Muslim or person of Middle Eastern descent.” Suppose also that the restaurant is very popular locally and that only 40 percent of...
For the "Civil Rights Act of 1991" law, you need to include sheets for the following...
For the "Civil Rights Act of 1991" law, you need to include sheets for the following four questions: 1. History/Background.: Why was the Law passed? What was going on in the workplace that required the law to be enacted to protect employees? 2. Components of the law: Research the law and summarize in your words (with in-text citations of the academic sources used) the major elements of the law. Do not cut and paste. 3. Observations on the law. Research...
Do you think that governments should consider human rights when granting preferential trading rights to countries?...
Do you think that governments should consider human rights when granting preferential trading rights to countries? What are the arguments for and against taking such a position? Provide examples
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT