Question

Instructions:
Research a case that involves any of the employment law concepts.
Read the case. Feel free to use secondary sources to help with understanding the case.
Answer the following questions in your own words and in complete sentences:
1. Who were the parties involved in the case?
2. In 3-4 sentences, what were the facts of the case (what were the parties suing about)?
3. What law(s) were involved in the case?
4. What did the highest court decide in the case?
5. Do you agree or disagree with the court's holding? Why?
Post your answers along with the case citation as a discussion post.

Answer 1

Answer-

This is one of the well known case including parties Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-elderly person from Albuquerque, New Mexico ( Plaintiff) and Mcdonalds(defedants).

For this situation, Plaintiff sued Mcdonalds to serve her Very Hot espresso which caused her severely charred areas when the espresso was spilled on her lap. Mcdonalds served her espresso with temperature 180–190 °F (82–88 °C) which is more than 20°F(11°C) when contrasted other café served espresso with customers.She was taken for emergency clinic where she went under skin uniting and shed 20 pounds of weaight during her time that is 8 days in the medical clinic.

This case is unmistakably a case of Product risk law since item obligation is a tort law wherein Manufacturer is hold subject for conveying damaged items to clients and cause mischief to them. For this situation, Mcdonalds hot espresso was deficient and cause hurt as severely charred area and Thousands of dollars clinic bills.

The case was chosen in Bernalillo County, N.M. Dist. Ct. 1994 where Jury chose case for Lieback. She was granted compensatory harm $160,000 and correctional harm of $2.7 million . Mcdonalds spoke to lessen the correctional harm and The preliminary appointed authority diminished the last decision to $640,000.

I concur with Courts holding on the grounds that compensatory harm was important to make up for all the costs She has endured . The corrective harm is additionally important to teach the activity of organization and set model with the goal that different organizations would not rehash such slip-up and stay cautious while conveying merchandise or administrations to clients.

Case name-Stella Liebeck v. McDonald's