When considering the different phases in group development
(forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning), what are...
When considering the different phases in group development
(forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning), what are
some typical situations that may occur in each phase?
Solutions
Expert Solution
The situtations that may occur during each phase of the group
development can be explained through a case example;
1.The "forming" stage takes place when the team first meets
each other. In this first meeting, team members are introduced to
each. They share information about their backgrounds, interests and
experience and form first impressions of each other.
They learn about the project they will be working on, discuss
the project's objectives/goals and start to think about what role
they will play on the project team. They are not yet working on the
project.
2.As the team begins to work together, they move into the
"storming" stage. This stage is not avoidable; every team - most
especially a new team who has never worked together before - goes
through this part of developing as a team. In this stage, the team
members compete with each other for status and for acceptance of
their ideas.
They have different opinions on what should be done and how it
should be done - which causes conflict within the team.
As they go progress through this stage, with the guidance of
the team leader, they learn how to solve problems together,
function both independently and together as a team, and settle into
roles and responsibilities on the team. For team members who do not
like conflict, this is a difficult stage to go through.
Some teams, however, do not move beyond this stage and the
entire project is spent in conflict and low morale and motivation,
making it difficult to get the project completed. Usually teams
comprised of members who are professionally immature will have a
difficult time getting past this stage.
3.When the team moves into the "norming" stage, they are
beginning to work more effectively as a team. They are no longer
focused on their individual goals, but rather are focused on
developing a way of working together (processes and procedures).
They respect each other's opinions and value their
differences.
Working together as a team seems more natural. In this stage,
the team has agreed on their team rules for working together, how
they will share information and resolve team conflict, and what
tools and processes they will use to get the job done.
The team members begin to trust each other and actively seek
each other out for assistance and input. Rather than compete
against each other, they are now helping each other to work toward
a common goal.
The team members also start to make significant progress on the
project as they begin working together more effectively.
4.In the "performing" stage, teams are functioning at a very
high level. The focus is on reaching the goal as a group. The team
members have gotten to know each other, trust each other and rely
on each other.
Not every team makes it to this level of team growth; some
teams stop at Stage 3: Norming. The highly performing team
functions without oversight and the members have become
interdependent.
The team is highly motivated to get the job done. They can make
decisions and problem solve quickly and effectively. When they
disagree, the team members can work through it and come to
consensus without interrupting the project's progress.
If there needs to be a change in team processes - the team will
come to agreement on changing processes on their own without
reliance on the team leader.
Even in this stage, there is a possibility that the team may
revert back to another stage. For example, it is possible for the
team to revert back to the "storming" stage if one of the members
starts working independently.
Or, the team could revert back to the "forming" stage if a new
member joins the team. If there are significant changes that throw
a wrench into the works, it is possible for the team to revert back
to an earlier stage until they are able to manage through the
change.
5.In the "adjourning" stage the project is coming to an end and
the team members are moving off into different directions. This
stage looks at the team from the perspective of the well-being of
the team rather than from the perspective of managing a team
through the original four stages of team growth.
It is likely that any group that reached Stage 4: Performing
will keep in touch with each other as they have become a very close
knit group and there will be sadness at separating and moving on to
other projects independently.
EXAMPLE:-
The Initial Meeting (Stage 1: Forming)-The day of the
face-to-face meeting in New York has arrived. All team members are
present. The agenda includes:
Personal introductions
Team building exercises
Information about the process improvement project
Discussion around team roles and responsibilities
Discussion around team norms for working together
Introduction on how to use the SharePoint site that will be
used for this project to share ideas, brainstorm, store project
documentation, etc
The onsite meeting is going well. The team members are getting
to know each other and have been discussing their personal lives
outside of work - hobbies, family, etc.
The Project Work Begins (Stage 2: Storming)-The team members
have gone back to their home offices and are beginning work on
their project. They are interacting via the SharePoint site and the
project is off to a good start.
And then the arguments begin.Conflict and difference in
opinions among the group members are typical situations that arise
during stage,which forms the crux of this phase.
The issues related to the leadership, responsibility,
strategies, rules, authority, evaluation, reward system, etc.
arises at the storming stage.
All is Going Smoothly (Stage 3: Norming)-The team has now been
working together for nearly 3 months. There is definitely a sense
of teamwork among the group. There are few arguments and
disagreements that can't be resolved among the team.
They support each other on the project - problem solving
issues, making decisions as a team, sharing information and
ensuring that the ground rules put in place for the team are
followed.Additionally, the team members are helping each other to
grow and develop their skills.
Significant Progress is Made! (Stage 4: Performing)-The team is
now considered a "high performing team." They can brainstorm
effectively to solve problems and are highly motivated to reach the
end goal as a group.
When there is conflict on the team - such as a disagreement on
how to go about accomplishing a task - the group is able to work it
out on their own without relying on the team leader to intervene
and make decisions for them
Time to Wrap Up (Stage 5: Adjourning)-The project has ended. It
was a huge success! The internal customer is pleased and there is
definitely an improvement in how the company supports its
clients.Team members move to different projects but also meet up
with each other to celebrate the success one last time.
Review one or more of the Forming – Storming – Norming –
Performing articles (links below OR find an article on your own)
and reflect upon your own team development process in your
workplace.
What are your thoughts on the model presented?
What has been your experience in team development?
How often would you like your Capsim team to meet?
What roles will each person take?
How will decisions be made?
Will one person document the process?
How to find...
Assignment Details
Bruce Tuckman's stages of team formation outlines four stages,
as follows:
Forming
Storming
Norming
Performing
Describe a time when you were required to work on a team, either
in school or in the workplace. Discuss the strategies the team
adopted to manage the teamwork process. Explain the importance of
collaboration in solving healthcare problems.
Team Development Stage 1 – Forming (200WORDS)
Team Development Stage 2 – Storming(200WORDS)
Team Development Stage 3 – Norming(200WORDS)
Team Development Stage 4 – Performing(200 WORDS)
WITH TWO PEER REFERNCES ABOVE 2010
Prepare a document that addresses the following:
Describes the different phases of the traditional systems
development life cycle (SDLC)
Compares the SDLC waterfall method to the spiral and agile
methods.
Explains how these methods are similar and how they are
different.
You may submit your paper in essay form or you may choose to use
a table that highlights the different phases of the SDLC and
compares it to spiral and agile methods.
What are the differences between classical theory and
what Keynes believed?
What are the different phases of the business cycle,
and how are production and employment affected in each
phase?