Question

In: Finance

Company A plans to replace with one of their current equipment with one of the three...

Company A plans to replace with one of their current equipment with one of the three options shown in the table.

Option

A

B

C

Initial Cost

200

350

475

Annual Operation Cost

450

275

300

Salvage Value

75

60

80

Estimated Life in Year

20

20

20

Perform AW analysis to figure out which option should company A choose. The rate of return is 8% per year compounded Monthly. Please see correct answer below how do you get this?

Time Window - Year
A B C
PMT ($469.24) ($310.18) ($347.77)
Winner

Solutions

Expert Solution

Option A
1.08
a b a*b
Year Outflows PV factor 8% [1/(1+r)^n] PV
0       (200.00) 1.00      (200.00)
1       (450.00) 0.93      (416.67)
2       (450.00) 0.86      (385.80)
3       (450.00) 0.79      (357.22)
4       (450.00) 0.74      (330.76)
5       (450.00) 0.68      (306.26)
6       (450.00) 0.63      (283.58)
7       (450.00) 0.58      (262.57)
8       (450.00) 0.54      (243.12)
9       (450.00) 0.50      (225.11)
10       (450.00) 0.46      (208.44)
11       (450.00) 0.43      (193.00)
12       (450.00) 0.40      (178.70)
13       (450.00) 0.37      (165.46)
14       (450.00) 0.34      (153.21)
15       (450.00) 0.32      (141.86)
16       (450.00) 0.29      (131.35)
17       (450.00) 0.27      (121.62)
18       (450.00) 0.25      (112.61)
19       (450.00) 0.23      (104.27)
20       (375.00) 0.21        (80.46)
Total 9.82 (4,602.08)
Total Pv of outflow (a) (4,602.08)
Total PV factor for the period (b) 9.82
Equivalent annual cost (a/b)      (468.73)
Option B
1.08
a b a*b
Year Outflows PV factor 8% [1/(1+r)^n] PV
0        (350.00) 1.00     (350.00)
1        (275.00) 0.93     (254.63)
2        (275.00) 0.86     (235.77)
3        (275.00) 0.79     (218.30)
4        (275.00) 0.74     (202.13)
5        (275.00) 0.68     (187.16)
6        (275.00) 0.63     (173.30)
7        (275.00) 0.58     (160.46)
8        (275.00) 0.54     (148.57)
9        (275.00) 0.50     (137.57)
10        (275.00) 0.46     (127.38)
11        (275.00) 0.43     (117.94)
12        (275.00) 0.40     (109.21)
13        (275.00) 0.37     (101.12)
14        (275.00) 0.34        (93.63)
15        (275.00) 0.32        (86.69)
16        (275.00) 0.29        (80.27)
17        (275.00) 0.27        (74.32)
18        (275.00) 0.25        (68.82)
19        (275.00) 0.23        (63.72)
20        (215.00) 0.21        (46.13)
Total 9.82 (3,037.12)
Total Pv of outflow (a) (3,037.12)
Total PV factor for the period (b) 9.82
Equivalent annual cost (a/b)     (309.34)
Option C
1.08
a b a*b
Year Outflows PV factor 8% [1/(1+r)^n] PV
0         (475.00) 1.00      (475.00)
1         (300.00) 0.93      (277.78)
2         (300.00) 0.86      (257.20)
3         (300.00) 0.79      (238.15)
4         (300.00) 0.74      (220.51)
5         (300.00) 0.68      (204.17)
6         (300.00) 0.63      (189.05)
7         (300.00) 0.58      (175.05)
8         (300.00) 0.54      (162.08)
9         (300.00) 0.50      (150.07)
10         (300.00) 0.46      (138.96)
11         (300.00) 0.43      (128.66)
12         (300.00) 0.40      (119.13)
13         (300.00) 0.37      (110.31)
14         (300.00) 0.34      (102.14)
15         (300.00) 0.32        (94.57)
16         (300.00) 0.29        (87.57)
17         (300.00) 0.27        (81.08)
18         (300.00) 0.25        (75.07)
19         (300.00) 0.23        (69.51)
20         (220.00) 0.21        (47.20)
Total 9.82 (3,403.28)
Total Pv of outflow (a) (3,403.28)
Total PV factor for the period (b) 9.82
Equivalent annual cost (a/b)      (346.63)
Notes:
1. In total PV factor 1 should be deducted since 0th year factor will not be taken
2. Values has small difference since the PV factor digits can vary
3. Salvage values should be added with 20th year outflow, since its an income
Conclusion
Since option B has lowest equivalent annual cost it is the clear winner.

Related Solutions

A company is considering whether to replace one of its construction equipment. • The existing equipment...
A company is considering whether to replace one of its construction equipment. • The existing equipment has a current cost of $15,000, which declines by 20% each year for three years. The operating cost for this equipment is $20,000 for year 1, $8,000 for year 2, and $12,000 for year 3. • The proposed equipment will cost $50,000, last five years, and has a market value that declines by 20% each year. The operating cost for the proposed equipment is...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 5 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 4 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 4 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 4 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 5 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 5 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance...
HL Construction Co. plans to replace one of its manufacturing equipment for a newer more technology-advance one. The new equipment has a purchase price of $8,000 and will be depreciated as a 7-year class for MACRS. Installation costs for the new equipment are $200. It is estimated that this equipment can be sold in 4 years (end of project) for $5,000. This new equipment is more efficient than the existing one and thus savings before taxes using the new equipment...
A company plans to replace its manual production system with an automated one Currently 5 people...
A company plans to replace its manual production system with an automated one Currently 5 people (2 on first shift, 2 on second, and one on third) are used. Their annual wages are $41,250 per person. Operating and maintenance of the new automated system will be 5.5% of the first cost of the system. The income tax rate is 40% and straight line depreciation is used over a 15 year life with no salvage. Salvage is expected to be 8%...
Project: replace existing equipment There are three possible scenarios for the cost savings the company could...
Project: replace existing equipment There are three possible scenarios for the cost savings the company could capture with the new equipment: Scenario 1: the company captures cost savings of $40,000/year (30% likelihood of occurring), Scenario 2: cost savings of $35,000/year (10% likelihood), and Scenario 3: cost savings of $30,000/year (60% likelihood). Initial investment: ($200,000) for replacement equipment, plus a positive revenue of $20,000 selling the replaced equipment in the used equipment market (NOTE: treat as scrap value at beginning of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT