In: Operations Management
What do you think are the most significant challenges, but also the potential benefits, of social media for emergency managers and PIOs (public information officer) in emergency management and crisis communications? Describe an example of an actual disaster or crisis incident in which social media had a major impact, whether good or bad. What is your assessment of how the organization, official or jurisdiction handled, used, or responded to social media in that event? Can social media ever actually be “managed?” Why or why not
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO Facebook has aptly said "When disasters happen, people need to know their loved ones are safe… It’s moments like this that being able to connect matters.” Highlighting the benefits of social media in emergency management.
Social media has evolved from being a place to look at the photos of what your friend had for lunch or his pet to a place where most people get their daily news. Today, the fist thing what most people do in the morning is to check Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter for notifications, trends and much more. Thus, when a crisis, such as a natural disaster or an epidemic, affects the public, social media, will always come into play.
Potential benefits:
Most significant challenges:
Despite the many benefits of social media in emergency management, we must also realise that there are risks as well. Such as when the information is incorrect or malicious, in which case it hinders response efforts.
Real-life example of a disaster (COVID-19):
The impact that COVID-19 has had is unprecedented. Of course, there is the impact of the disease itself, but it is also forcing organizations to continue to operate while a large portion of its employees work from home.
For government social media managers and public information officers (PIOs) this has created many challenges. The public is desperate for information, not only about the spread of the disease, but also about available services and potential closures. And when the situation is evolving on an hourly basis, providing this crucial information can be difficult.
Within this framework of complexity, social media has placed various roles during this COVID-19 pandemic:
My assessment on how the organisations, official/jurisdiction handled are responding to social media in this event:
Herbal cures for coronavirus infection, pictures mimicking government notifications, communal content, audio clips declaring national emergency are few examples of how fake news and misinformation is being circulated on social media platforms sparking panic while making it difficult for the government and others to do do their jobs in these difficult times.
With increasing pressure from the governments on curbing COVID-19 related fake news, social media platforms are relying on fact checkers and users to report misinformation. In absence of an effective government plan to fast-track intermediary guidelines for social media firms, these companies have been rolling out measures.
For instance, apart from fact-checking and launching a messenger chatbot, Facebook has banned ads or listings selling coronavirus-related products such as masks or sanitisers. WhatsApp, which has been dealing with fake news and hate speech menace for long now, has launched a chatbot in partnership with health ministry for disseminating authentic information on COVID-19.
Can social media ever actually be “managed”?
In my view, Yes!
Social media can cause “unimaginable disruption” to democracy, if not regulated.