In: Statistics and Probability
The concentration of pollutants in the atmosphere is affected by some meteorological variables such as relative humidity, temperature, atmospheric pressure, among others. On the other hand, the dispersion of these pollutants is influenced by the stability that prevails in the atmosphere. At the regional level, attention has been paid to the problem of air pollution, mainly due to the oil activities that take place in southwestern Mexico. Through an automated monitoring network known as the Automated System of the Southern Region (SAMARS) of Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), the main air pollutants (except ozone) and meteorological variables are monitored. This network has been operating since 1999 and has six monitoring stations located on the outskirts of the oil facilities (Batteries and Compressors). The information collected to date has been used mainly in the evaluation of air quality in the periphery of these facilities, in the calibration of pollutant dispersion models, and in their spatial distribution. The pollutants whose concentrations were studied are SO2 (sulfur dioxide), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide), and H2S (hydrogen sulfide); In this activity we will focus only on sulfur dioxide and its relationship with some meteorological variables. This information was obtained at a monitoring station in northern Chiapas. 1) The following average SO2 concentrations per year were obtained in ppb (parts per billion):
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
PPB |
12.1 |
8.7 |
8.3 |
5.8 |
6.1 |
b) Obtain the Pearson correlation coefficient between both variables and make an interpretation of it 2) The following data refer to the SO2 concentration time (t), temperature (T), relative humidity (RH) and atmospheric pressure (P) in the last 12 months:
(ppb) |
Time |
Temperature () |
Relative Humidity (%) |
Atmosferic Pressure (mb) |
10.3 |
1 |
14 |
31 |
980 |
9.9 |
2 |
17 |
42 |
1010 |
9.4 |
3 |
21 |
52 |
1003 |
10.6 |
4 |
28 |
63 |
1020 |
10.1 |
5 |
33 |
74 |
990 |
14.3 |
6 |
35 |
88 |
1050 |
13.3 |
7 |
36 |
84 |
1070 |
8.2 |
8 |
35 |
86 |
1025 |
8.8 |
9 |
32 |
90 |
995 |
9.1 |
10 |
27 |
81 |
1005 |
10 |
11 |
23 |
62 |
1080 |
10.4 |
12 |
18 |
42 |
1056 |
Fit a multiple linear regression model to estimate the SO2 concentration in the coming months.
Expert Answer
Correlation coefficient is given by -0.93.
There is strong negative correlation between two variables.
With every year the PPB is decreasing.
Used excel function correl(data) for above calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.755 | |||||
R Square | 0.571 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.325 | |||||
Standard Error | 1.449 | |||||
Observations | 12 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 4 | 19.546 | 4.887 | 2.327 | 0.155 | |
Residual | 7 | 14.701 | 2.100 | |||
Total | 11 | 34.247 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
Intercept | -34.610 | 17.832 | -1.941 | 0.093 | -76.776 | 7.556 |
t | -0.329 | 0.194 | -1.696 | 0.134 | -0.787 | 0.130 |
T | 0.051 | 0.213 | 0.241 | 0.816 | -0.452 | 0.555 |
RH | 0.006 | 0.085 | 0.071 | 0.945 | -0.195 | 0.207 |
P | 0.044 | 0.018 | 2.437 | 0.045 | 0.001 | 0.087 |
Excel instruction are