Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A POLYGRAPH (LIE DETECTOR) IS AN INSTRUMENT USED TO DETERMINE IF AN INDIVIDUAL IS TELLING THE...

A POLYGRAPH (LIE DETECTOR) IS AN INSTRUMENT USED TO DETERMINE IF AN INDIVIDUAL IS TELLING THE TRUTH. THESE TESTS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE 95 % RELIABLE. IN OTHER WORDS, IF AN INDIVIDUAL LIES, THERE IS A .95 PROBABILITY THAT THE TEST WILL DETECT A LIE. LET THERE ALSO BE A .025 PROBABILITY THAT THE TEST ERRONEOUSLY DETECTS A LIE EVEN WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL IS ACTUALLY TELLING THE TRUTH. CONSIDER THE NULL HYPOTHESIS, "THE INDIVIDUAL IS TELLING THE TRUTH, THE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS

WHAT IS THE POBABLITY OF A TYPE I ERROR?

WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY OF A TYPE II ERROR

Solutions

Expert Solution

Let us consider the hypothesis testing  

Type I error is the error when we reject the null hypothesis when it will be true

Type II error is the error, when we will accept  the null hypothesis when it will be false

Below considerations about the alternative hypotheses null hypothesis are given

There are two conditions

null hypothesis : the individual is telling the truth

alternate hypothesis: the individual is not telling the truth

which is shown in below table

Decision Actual
Lie Truth
Detected 0.95 0.005
(Type 1 error)
False lie (positive)
Not detected 1-0.9=0.05
(Type 11 error)
False truth(Negative)
0.995
Type I error=0.005
P(Type I error)=0.005
Type II error =0.05
P(Type II)=1-P(Lie was called as lie)=1-0.95=0.05

As the type 1 error is incorrect reject null hypothesis so it is false lie call

As the type II error is incorrectly failing to reject null hypothesis so it false truth call

So the probability of Type I error is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis, when it is true.

So, the probability of Type I error is probability that the lie detector detects a lie, while the person actually telling a truth.

Hence, the probability of Type I error is 0.005

Let us now discuss about type II error

The probability of Type II error is the probability of not rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false.

So the probability of Type II error is probability that the lie detector detects a truth while the person actually telling a lie.

Hence, the probability of Type II error is (100-95)%-=5%

Due to Type I error analyst wrongly  concludes that the person is telling a lie while the person actually telling a truth.

Due to Type II error analyst wrongly concludes that the person is telling a truth while the person actually telling a lie.

So We can not accept the null hypothesis but do not reject the null hypothesis

if there exists the consistency in sample evidence with the null hypothesis.

If we do not reject the null hypothesis So it means that it will not  prove that the individual is telling a truth.


Related Solutions

suppose a police detective is about to administer a polygraph (lie detector) test on an "individual...
suppose a police detective is about to administer a polygraph (lie detector) test on an "individual of interest" . when a polygraph is administered to an individual who is lying, the chance that the test detects that the individual is lying is 90%. additionally, when polygraph test is administered to an individual who is telling the truth, the chance that the test indicates that the individual is not lying is 84%. finally, the police detective knows that "individuals of interest"...
The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each case,...
The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each case, it was known if the subjected lied or did not lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truth and lies? . Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. A....
The table below includes results from polygraph​ (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each​ case,...
The table below includes results from polygraph​ (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each​ case, it was known if the subjected lied or did not​ lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truth and​ lies? Did the Subject Actually​ Lie? No​ (Did Not​...
The table below includes results from polygraph? (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each? case,...
The table below includes results from polygraph? (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each? case, it was known if the subjected lied or did not? lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truth and? lies? State the null and alternate hypothesis, test statistic,...
The table below includes results from polygraph​ (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each​ case,...
The table below includes results from polygraph​ (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each​ case, it was known if the subjected lied or did not​ lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truth and​ lies? _                      Did_Not_Lie      Lied Polygraph_indicated_lie         11  ...
The table below includes results from polygraph​ (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each​ case,...
The table below includes results from polygraph​ (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers. In each​ case, it was known if the subjected lied or did not​ lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truth and​ lies? Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. A. Ho​:...
Lie Detector: Suppose a lie detector allows 20% of all lies to go undetected. (a) If...
Lie Detector: Suppose a lie detector allows 20% of all lies to go undetected. (a) If you take the test and tell 10 lies, what is the probability of having 5 or more go undetected? Round your answer to 3 decimal places. (b) Would 5 undetected lies be an unusually high number* of undetected lies? Use the criteria that a number (x) is unusually large if P(x or more) ≤ 0.05. -Yes, that is an unusually high number of undetected...
A new lie-detector machine is invented and tested. When test subjects lie, the machine catches 86%...
A new lie-detector machine is invented and tested. When test subjects lie, the machine catches 86% of them in a lie. When test subjects tell the truth, the machine thinks that 6% of them lie. A local police department begins to use this lie-detector machine in interrogations. Suppose that 15% of people arrested lie in their interrogations. The police interrogated a subject and the machine indicated that the person was telling the truth. What is the probability that the subject...
. A lie detector will show a positive reading 10% of the time when a person...
. A lie detector will show a positive reading 10% of the time when a person is really telling the truth, and a lie detector will show a positive reading 90% of the time when a person is in fact lying. The lie detector is tested on three subjects. The first subject is (secretly) known to lie to every single question, no matter what the question (Remind you of anyone?). The second lies to 70% of all questions, and the...
A new? lie-detector test has been devised and must be tested before it is put into...
A new? lie-detector test has been devised and must be tested before it is put into use. Three hundred people are selected at? random, and each person draws and keeps a card from a box of 300 cards. Half the cards instruct the person to lie and the others instruct the person to tell the truth. Of those who? lied, 70?% fail the new? lie-detector test? (that is the test indicated? lying). Of those who told the? truth, 5?% failed...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT