Question

In: Economics

For most of the 1800s, the United States did not recognize the copyrights of books written...

For most of the 1800s, the United States did not recognize the copyrights of books written by foreign authors. As a result, many U.S. publishers printed “pirated”—unauthorized—editions of Charles Dickens and other British authors without paying them royalties. A history of book publishing noted, “[U.S.] publishers claimed that pirating [foreign] works allowed their prices to remain low, which in turn made the works more accessible to the public at large.” There were (eventually successful) attempts in Congress to recognize foreign copyrights in exchange for other countries recognizing U.S. copyrights. At the time, one U.S. publisher described these efforts as the “clamor of two hundred authors against the interests of fifty-five million people.” Do copyright laws benefit authors at the expense of readers? If so, why does the U.S. Constitution give Congress the right to enact copyright laws?

Source: J. P. Romney and Rebecca Romney, Printer’s Error: Irreverent Stories from Book History, New York: Harper, 2017, pp. 218, 227.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Claims made by US publishers which state that recognition of foreign authors was at the cost of %% million uses can not completely accepted nor denied. When copywrites are in place, royalty needs to be paid for to the writers and this increases the cost of the final book for the consumer. Copywrites are crucial since they are set in place to protect the work done. It forms a sort of a reward for the hard work of the artist of the writer.

If the book is well written people will pay the price to buy it. A lot of people in the current times prefer E copies of the book that are cheaper and easy to carry.

There are other reasons like IPR (intellectual Property Rights) that other countries follow. Writers can claim for their work citation done without prior permission. There can be monetary punishments and legal actions that can take place. In situations of legal suits, acknowledging the copywrite can help trace back to the original source for further clarification of the context. Had this been missing, the law suits would directly be push on to the publishing house.

As true as the claim made by the US publishers of increased cost is, it is equally important to give credits where they are due.


Related Solutions

For most of the 1800s, the United States did not recognize the copyrights of books written...
For most of the 1800s, the United States did not recognize the copyrights of books written by foreign authors. As a result, many U.S. publishers printed “pirated”—unauthorized—editions of Charles Dickens and other British authors without paying them royalties. A history of book publishing noted, “[U.S.] publishers claimed that pirating [foreign] works allowed their prices to remain low, which in turn made the works more accessible to the public at large.” There were (eventually successful) attempts in Congress to recognize foreign...
Throughout most of the 1800s, the United States was a fairly isolationist nation especially in regards...
Throughout most of the 1800s, the United States was a fairly isolationist nation especially in regards to not intervening in European affairs. Contrast the arguments made by leading isolationists and interventionists (expansionists) in the U.S. from the 1890s to the 1960s. Which side made the best argument overall and why? Should the U.S. have intervened in the conflicts it did (i.e. Spanish-American War, PhilippineAmerican War, World War I, World War II, and Vietnam) or not?
During most of the 1800s the US government only protected copyrights for US citizens. In particular,...
During most of the 1800s the US government only protected copyrights for US citizens. In particular, books written by British authors, which were very popular in the US, could be printed and sold by US publishers without paying royalties to British authors. Because the US did not enforce copyright for British authors, the United Kingdom did not enforce copyright for US authors, meaning that British publishers could print and sell books by US authors without paying any royalties to them....
Explain the economic changes in northern states of the United States in the early 1800s. How...
Explain the economic changes in northern states of the United States in the early 1800s. How did industrialization, urbanization, the market revolution, and the transportation revolution change America? What were its effects on society and culture?
(TCO 1) Compare healthcare in the United States today with healthcare in the 1800s. What are...
(TCO 1) Compare healthcare in the United States today with healthcare in the 1800s. What are the most important differences?
Prepare a brief written summary of the procedures for applying for patents, copyrights and trademarks?
Prepare a brief written summary of the procedures for applying for patents, copyrights and trademarks?
In what ways did the Age of Reform change the United States? How did the reform...
In what ways did the Age of Reform change the United States? How did the reform movement affect the political and social landscape of the period, and what were the consequences? Be sure to consider how the reformers promoted their messages, who listened and participated, and what specific actions that they encouraged.
Why did the United States become an imperial power in 1898, and how did that expansion...
Why did the United States become an imperial power in 1898, and how did that expansion compare to the previous history of U.S. foreign relations? How would you characterize U.S. relations with the rest of the world in the years between 1898 and WWI?
How did Haiti made the The United States what it is today??
How did Haiti made the The United States what it is today??
how did Japan involve the United States in World War 2? Why did they want the...
how did Japan involve the United States in World War 2? Why did they want the United States involved?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT