Question

In: Finance

Explain how materiality and audit procedures to gather evidence are important in planning an audit.

Explain how materiality and audit procedures to gather evidence are important in planning an audit.

Solutions

Expert Solution

However, ISA 320 Materiality in planning and performing an audit does not include a definition
for materiality. Perhaps the most important reason why materiality is not defined in the ISA is because the principle of materiality is first and foremost a financial reporting, rather than an
auditing, concept. Also, the interpretation may differ in different parts of the world.
Financial reporting frameworks often discuss the concept of materiality in the context of the preparation and presentation of financial statements. It is important therefore that auditors refer to any discussion of materiality in the financial reporting framework when determining materiality for the audit. Such a discussion, if present, provides auditors with a frame of reference.
The ISA does, however, highlight some key words and phrases in relation to materiality in the context of an audit which include:


• misstatements (including omissions) which could influence decisions of users of the financial statements;
• judgement (ie, there is not a single right answer) based on surrounding circumstances
including the size and nature of the misstatement; and
• that those decisions are based on the users’ common needs as a group.

AS 500—Audit Evidence, contains significant guidance explaining what constitutes audit evidence. It deals with the auditor’s responsibility to design and perform audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor’s opinion. If not displayed, selected requirements and application guidance found in CAS 500 may be viewed by clicking the “more” feature displayed in the standards information above.

Audit procedures for obtaining audit evidence

The evidence-gathering process involves the following steps:

designing the audit procedures or tests;carrying out the audit procedures or tests and/or gathering evidence;analyzing evidence and drawing conclusions, which may also involve evaluating performance against the audit criteria; andmaking decisions about whether additional information is required and can be obtained (go back to step 1) or whether sufficient appropriate evidence exists.

Audit procedures typically focus on the key risk areas identified through a risk analysis.

It is not unusual for audits to be redesigned during the examination stage as teams encounter unforeseen difficulties in gathering sufficient evidence of appropriate quality. Auditors have to be alert to any signs that the evidence-gathering process may not be achieving the level of assurance required for the audit assignment and take appropriate corrective action. If there are any potential amendments to the audit program, communicate these changes and raise any other issues, on a timely basis, with the senior members of the audit team. In instances where modifications did not take place before the start of field work, modify the audit steps as the work progresses, obtain approval for changes to audit programs, and include appropriate information on the nature, timing, and extent of steps to be performed.
Inspection. Inspection of documents and records provides varying degrees of reliability, depending on the nature and source of the documents. Inspection of physical assets provides highly reliable evidence of existence and some indication of value (if it does not appear damaged or obsolete) but not necessarily of ownership or value.

Observation. Observation of the application of a client’s or entity’s policy or procedure provides assurance of that procedure at a given point in time, but not necessarily of its performance at other times during the year.

External confirmation. Confirmation is a written request addressed to third parties.

Recalculation. Computation or recalculation provides a high level of assurance regarding arithmetical accuracy.

Reperformance. Reperformance techniques may be performed manually or through the use of computer-assisted audit techniques


Related Solutions

From the following audit concepts: audit planning and Analytical procedures, internal control, inherent risk, materiality, audit...
From the following audit concepts: audit planning and Analytical procedures, internal control, inherent risk, materiality, audit sampling, control risk, tests of controls, substantives tests of transactions; what concepts will be most useful to your professional life in the accounting field or as an employee of an audited company? Please explain and provide specific examples. 
From the following audit concepts: audit planning and Analytical procedures, internal control, inherent risk, materiality, audit...
From the following audit concepts: audit planning and Analytical procedures, internal control, inherent risk, materiality, audit sampling, control risk, tests of controls, substantives tests of transactions; what concepts will be most useful to your professional life in the accounting field or as an employee of an audited company? Please explain and provide specific examples. 
Discuss how analytical procedures can be used as substantive audit procedures to provide audit evidence. Illustrate...
Discuss how analytical procedures can be used as substantive audit procedures to provide audit evidence. Illustrate your answer with an example.
Discuss, in detail, the relationship between audit risk, materiality, and evidence.
Discuss, in detail, the relationship between audit risk, materiality, and evidence.
1. Discuss how important is the risk assessment stage in audit engagements? Explain what audit procedures...
1. Discuss how important is the risk assessment stage in audit engagements? Explain what audit procedures auditor perform in this stage and how the results of these procedures would affect the other stage of the audit? 2. Explain what types of audit opinions auditors can issue and what are the possible reasons for issuing these opinions? Furthermore, discuss the circumstances that require auditors to modify the standard report but not the audit opinion.
describe materiality and how an auditor asseses and identifies materiality for an operational audit, compliance audit...
describe materiality and how an auditor asseses and identifies materiality for an operational audit, compliance audit and financial statement audit?
For each of the following specific audit procedures, indicate the type of audit evidence it is...
For each of the following specific audit procedures, indicate the type of audit evidence it is gathering: (1) inspection of records or documents, (2) inspection of tangible assets, (3) observation, (4) inquiry, (5) confirmation, (6) recalculation, (7) reperformance, (8) analytical procedures, and (9) scanning. The audit evidences can be used more than once. a. Discussing the recording of sales discounts in the fourth quarter with the accounts receivable manager. b. Examining sales invoices for supporting customer order and shipping documents....
Audit Evidence – Is it Persuasive? As a staff auditor you are asked to gather information...
Audit Evidence – Is it Persuasive? As a staff auditor you are asked to gather information about the existence of physical inventory. For each of the three types of audit evidence obtained, discuss whether the audit evidence is appropriate and sufficient. Physical examination of inventory in warehouse.Documented discussion with inventory control manager that the inventory agrees to the accounting records and is in saleable condition.Observation of annual physical inventory count and re-performance of a sample inventory counts.Explain with Real World...
Materiality (AU-C 320, AS 2105) – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit Using the 12/31/14...
Materiality (AU-C 320, AS 2105) – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit Using the 12/31/14 Apollo trial balances calculate preliminary materiality for the financial statements as a whole using the following approaches: 5.0% of pre-tax income 0.5% of total assets 1.0% of equity 0.5% of total revenues Based on your engagement planning analysis, which preliminary materiality measure would you recommend?
Explain Audit Evidence in particular (i)     Sufficient Audit Evidence     (ii)    Relevant Audit Evidence     (iii)   ...
Explain Audit Evidence in particular (i)     Sufficient Audit Evidence     (ii)    Relevant Audit Evidence     (iii)    Reliable Audit Evidence
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT