In: Accounting
Materiality (AU-C 320, AS 2105) – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit Using the 12/31/14 Apollo trial balances calculate preliminary materiality for the financial statements as a whole using the following approaches: 5.0% of pre-tax income 0.5% of total assets 1.0% of equity 0.5% of total revenues Based on your engagement planning analysis, which preliminary materiality measure would you recommend?
The auditor shall determine performance materiality for purposes of assessing the risks of material misstatement and determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures
The auditor shall revise materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) in the event of becoming aware of information during the audit that would have caused the auditor to have determined a different amount (or amounts) initially.
If the auditor concludes that a lower materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) than that initially determined is appropriate, the auditor shall determine whether it is necessary to revise performance materiality, and whether the nature, timing and extent of the further audit procedures remain appropriate.
Determining materiality involves the exercise of professional judgment. A percentage is often applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
Factors that may affect the identification of an appropriate
benchmark include the following:
• The elements of the financial statements (for example, assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses);
• Whether there are items on which the attention of the users of the particular entity’s financial statements tends to be focused (for example, for the purpose of evaluating financial performance users may tend to focus on profit, revenue or net assets);
• The nature of the entity, where the entity is in its life cycle, and the industry and economic environment in which the entity operates;
• The entity’s ownership structure and the way it is financed (for example, if an entity is financed solely by debt rather than equity, users may put more emphasis on assets, and claims on them, than on the entity’s earnings); and
• The relative volatility of the benchmark.