In: Accounting
Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It
entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for
March.
Date | Activities | Units Acquired at Cost | Units Sold at Retail | |||||||||
Mar. | 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | units | @ $50.00 per unit | |||||||
Mar. | 5 | Purchase | 400 | units | @ $55.00 per unit | |||||||
Mar. | 9 | Sales | 420 | units | @ $85.00 per unit | |||||||
Mar. | 18 | Purchase | 120 | units | @ $60.00 per unit | |||||||
Mar. | 25 | Purchase | 200 | units | @ $62.00 per unit | |||||||
Mar. | 29 | Sales | 160 | units | @ $95.00 per unit | |||||||
Totals | 820 | units | 580 | units | ||||||||
4. Compute gross profit earned by the company
for each of the four costing methods. For specific identification,
the March 9 sale consisted of 80 units from beginning inventory and
340 units from the March 5 purchase; the March 29 sale consisted of
40 units from the March 18 purchase and 120 units from the March 25
purchase. (Round weighted average cost per unit to two
decimals.)
Date | Transaction | Purchases | Cost of Goods Sold | Inventory Balance | ||||||
Units | Unit Cost | Amount | Units | Unit Cost | Amount | Units | Unit CostAmount | |||
FIFO | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||
March 1 | Beginning Inventory | 100 | 50 | 5,000 | ||||||
Mar 5 | Purchases | 400 | 55 | 22,000 |
100 400 |
50 55 |
5,000 22,000 |
|||
Mar 9 | Sale |
100 320 |
50 55 |
5,000 17,600 |
80 | 55 | 4,400 | |||
Mar 18 | Purchases | 120 | 60 | 7,200 |
80 120 |
55 60 |
4,400 7,200 |
|||
Mar 25 | Purchase | 200 | 62 | 12,400 |
80 120 200 |
55 60 62 |
4,400 7,200 12,400 |
|||
Mar 29 | Sales |
80 80 |
55 60 |
4,400 4,800 |
40 200 |
60 62 |
2,400 12,400 |
|||
Mar 31 | Totals | 720 | 41,600 | 580 | 31,800 | 240 | 14,800 | |||
LIFO | Purchases | Cost of Goods Sold | Inventory Balance | |||||||
Mar 1 | Beginning Inventory | 100 | 50 | 5,000 | ||||||
Mar 5 | Purchase | 400 | 55 | 22,000 |
100 400 |
50 55 |
5,000 22,000 |
|||
Mar 9 | Sales |
400 20 |
55 50 |
22,000 1,000 |
80 | 50 | 4,000 | |||
Mar 18 | Purchase | 120 | 60 | 7,200 |
80 120 |
50 60 |
4,000 7,200 |
|||
Mar 25 | Purchase | 200 | 62 | 12,400 |
80 120 200 |
50 60 62 |
4,000 7,200 12,400 |
|||
Mar 29 | Sales | 160 | 62 | 9,920 |
80 120 40 |
50 60 62 |
4,000 7,200 2,480 |
|||
Mar 31 | Totals | 720 | 41,600 | 580 | 32,920 | 240 | 13,680 | |||
Weighted Average | ||||||||||
Mar 1 | 100 | 50 | 5,000 | |||||||
Mar 5 | 400 | 55 | 22,000 |
100 400 |
50 55 |
5,000 22,000 |
||||
Mar 5 | Average Cost | 500 | 54 | 27,000 | ||||||
Mar 9 | Sales | 420 | 54 | 22,680 | 80 | 54 | 4,320 | |||
Mar 18 | Purchase | 120 | 60 | 7,200 |
80 120 |
54 60 |
4,320 7,200 |
|||
Mar 18 | Average Cost | 200 | 57.60 | 11,520 | ||||||
Mar 25 | Purchase | 200 | 62 | 12,400 |
200 200 |
57.60 62 |
11,520 12,400 |
|||
Average Cost | 400 | 59.80 | 23,920 | |||||||
Mar 29 | Sales | 160 | 59.80 | 9,568 | 240 | 59,80 | 14,352 | |||
Mar 31 | Totals | 720 | 41,600 | 580 | 32,248 | 240 | 14,352 | |||
Specific Identification | ||||||||||
Mar 1 | 100 | 50 | 5,000 | |||||||
Mar 5 | Purchase | 400 | 55 | 22,000 |
100 400 |
50 55 |
5,000 22,000 |
|||
Mar 9 | Sales |
80 340 |
50 55 |
4,000 18,700 |
20 60 |
50 55 |
1,000 3,300 |
|||
Mar 18 | Purchase | 120 | 60 | 7,200 |
20 60 120 |
50 55 60 |
1,000 3,300 7,200 |
|||
Mar 25 | Purchase | 200 | 62 | 12,400 |
20 60 120 200 |
50 55 60 62 |
1,000 3,300 7,200 12,400 |
|||
Mar 29 | Sales |
40 120 |
60 62 |
2,400 7,440 |
20 60 80 80 |
50 55 60 62 |
1,000 3,300 4,800 4,960 |
|||
Mar 31 | Totals | 720 | 41,600 | 580 | 32,540 | 240 | 14,060 |
Gross Profit:
FIFO | LIFO | Weighted Average | Specific Identification | |
Sales | $ 50,900 | $ 50,900 | $ 50,900 | $ 50,900 |
Cost of Goods Sold | 31,800 | 32,940 | 32,248 | 32,540 |
Gross Profit | $ 19,100 | $ 17,960 | $ 18,652 | $ 18,360 |