Question

Should the Electoral College be abolished? Should it remain as it is? Argue your answer using at least two supporting points. In addition, discuss two arguments that are counter to yours, and argue against them.

Answer 1

Answer)

No it should not be abolished because of following advantages :-

1.It requires a circulation of mainstream bolster.

On account of the structure of the Electoral College, a President must get national help to win an election. This advances a solid cohesiveness inside the nation in light of the fact that there must be a dissemination of that help so a lion's share of electoral votes can be gotten. Without this structure, a hopeful would invest the greater part of their energy in extensive populace focuses battling in light of the fact that that is the place the famous vote would be won.

2. It gives minority interests a say in the election.

Since a national level of help is required due to the Electoral College, minority causes, interests, and concerns are given a voice that achieves a national level. The votes of a little minority in a state can influence the distinction in an election, particularly since most states grant all their electoral votes to the champ of the well known vote. This enables a specific measure of use to be utilized amid the election that may not be conceivable all in all general public generally.

3. It supports political stability.

The United States centers around a two-party system due to the structure in the Electoral College. That doesn't mean other political gatherings can't get engaged with the election. It just means most applicants that are chosen will be either a Republican or a Democrat. The main autonomous possibility to be chosen President in US history was George Washington. The last third-party contender to win a state's electoral votes was George Wallace in 1968. This implies there is a sensible conviction in the matter of how the administration will run, regardless of which significant party in the US ends up with the white house.

4. It keeps up a system of national portrayal.

The United States was established on the possibility that taxation without portrayal was out of line. It was a piece of the purpose behind the disobedience of the provinces in any case. With the Electoral College, a general agreement can be kept up so the structure of the legislature and the free political forces of each state and neighborhood government can keep existing. In national portrayal, each state and populace region gets equivalent portrayal, in either the house or the senate, and that enables singular voters to in any case have a say in what happens.

Some of its disadvantaged that could leas to its abolishment are as follows :-

1. It makes the likelihood of a minority president being chosen.

The US has chosen two minority presidents over the most recent 20 years as a result of the Electoral College. In 1992, President Bill Clinton was chosen with under half of the aggregate prevalent vote too. In the event that nobody singular hopeful achieves the 270 edge, at that point any individual who has gotten an electoral vote can be chosen President by the administrative branch of the government. Everything necessary is 1 electoral vote.

2. There is a danger of irresolute electors throwing tallies.

No balloter has changed the result of an election in the United States by not voting in favor of the competitor their individual voters needed, however the structure of the Electoral College makes it a plausibility. There have been 167 fickle electors ever, yet 81 of those votes were changed on the grounds that the first hopeful kicked the bucket before the date on which the votes were to be thrown. In 2016, there were 10 shifty electors.

3. It can discourage voter turnout in a few territories.

In the 2016 Presidential election, hopeful Hillary Clinton had a reliable 15-to 20-point lead over Donald Trump in the surveying for half a month prior to the election. The ultimate result demonstrated a distinction of 16.2 rate focuses. For Republicans or Independents, throwing a poll for the election could appear to be inconsequential in light of the fact that Clinton's win appeared like an inevitable end product. In light of the structure of the Electoral College, this can prompt voters picking not to vote since they feel like their vote wouldn't make any difference at any rate.