Question

In: Accounting

How does the law define partnership? Why would people choose to establish a partnership instead of...

How does the law define partnership? Why would people choose to establish a partnership instead of a company? Discuss some of the important cases (at least 3) which developed the law of partnership. What are some of the most important legal principles established in those cases? (Australian law)

Solutions

Expert Solution

The Partnership Act 1958 (Vic), for a partnership in Australia to exist, four main criteria must be satisfied. They are:

  • Valid Agreement between the parties;
  • To carry on a business – this is defined in s. 3 as "any trade, occupation or profession";
  • In Common – meaning there must be some mutuality of rights, interests and obligations;
  • View to Profit – thus charitable organizations cannot be partnerships (charities are typically incorporated associations under Associations Incorporations Act 1981 (Vic))

Some important cases which developed the law of Partnership are as follows:

Partner's liability

Partners share profits and losses. A partnership is basically a settlement between two or more groups or firms in which profit and loss are equally divided.

Perhaps the most important question for any partner is 'what is my liability under this arrangement'.

In essence, the liability of a partner (or even a non-partner who was 'held out' to be a partner see below) is significantly large. Every partner or person held out to be a partner is both an agent and principal of the firm and may thus bind the firm and the partners: s.9. Simply, each partner is his brother's proverbial keeper and will be responsible both legally and financially for the actions of the other partners in the general course of business.

To give a clear example, where one partner acts negligently and there is no indemnity insurance (or the indemnity insurer refuses to cover the loss), the liability of all partners will be joint and several: s.16. The cause of major distress for partners arises where the other partners become insolvent. The weight of total liability would rest on the solvent partners. Thus put simply, even if a person only had a 25% partner's share, he or she would be responsible for covering all 100% (potentially exorbitantly exceeding their investment) of the damage arising from the negligence if the other partners do not have the means to pay.

As alluded to above, the issue of "holding out", which is discussed in s.18(1) of the Act, is particularly relevant. "Holding out" refers to where a non-partner advertises himself or alternatively is advertised to the world as being a partner. This advertising can be either explicit and/or implicit

For example, where the firm permits a non-partner to 'sign off' on company accounts or documents or where a non-partner has an office next to the partner's or even enjoys the perks of the true partners, these are implicit indication to the world that the non-partner is actually a partner. To exemplify express indications, this would occur where a non-partner has his name on the company letter-head or to go even further, actively introduces himself as a partner.

Not only may the non-partner be held to be liable as a partner, the true partners will also be liable for the non-partners actions just as they would be for the actions of a true partner. This is provided that the relevant third-party was reasonably unaware of the non-partner's true position in the business and the conduct on the non-partner could be described as in the ordinary course of business. These two are generally part and parcel as if the transaction is not in the ordinary course of business, then the less likely it is that a third party would genuinely believe that the non-partner was a partner.

Limited partnership

Limited Partnerships are governed by Part III of the Act. The paramount characteristic of such a partnership is that a limited partner's liability will be limited: See s.49(1) definition.

Section 60(1) indicates that the liability of limited partner limited to amount shown in Register (Register of Limited Partnerships, see s. 57). Typically, a limited partner would make a contribution to the capital or assets of the partnership. An interpretation of s.60(2) suggests that the limited partner's liability would not exceed the contribution made or promised.

Other key points to note are that:

  • A limited partner can not take part in the management of the business of the limited partnership: s.67(1). If he or she does so, they will be liable as general partners by virtue of s.67(2)Dissolution of a Partnership

Dissolution of a partnership

It occurs when there is a change in the relationship of the partners, as a result of a partner ceasing to be associated or a part of carrying on the business. Situations which can be a catalyst for dissolution are

  • Action by partners – taking the form of either the notice of dissolution of a previously indefinite partnership agreement which is given by a partner which is agreed to by the other partners, or when the partners agree to dissolve the partnership after the termination of a single or multiple undertakings. An example of the latter would be the partners' prior agreement an expiration date (though the partners may at will choose to continue the partnership after a pre-agreed expiration date if they so choose). Any such action to dissolve the partnership by partners is a grounds for automatic dissolution
  • Operation of law – the partnership may be dissolved in the event of a partner's death or bankruptcy, so long as the other partner(s) agree to the dissolution. Operation of law is also grounds for automatic dissolution.
  • Illegality – a partnership is automatically dissolved when an event renders the purpose of the partnership illegal or against public policy
  • By the court – when none of the automatic grounds for dissolution listed above are present, one or more partners may apply for dissolution through a court. Examples include insanity, permanent incapacity, one partner's conduct which a court finds detrimental to the business, wilful or persistent breach of the partnership agreement, or whenever a court finds dissolution of the partnership to be just and equitable.

Related Solutions

How does the law define partnership? Why would people choose to establish a partnership instead of...
How does the law define partnership? Why would people choose to establish a partnership instead of a company? Discuss some of the important cases which developed the law of partnership. What are some of the most important legal principles established in those cases?
QUESTION 1: How does the law define partnership? Why would people choose to establish a partnership...
QUESTION 1: How does the law define partnership? Why would people choose to establish a partnership instead of a company? Discuss some of the important cases which developed the law of partnership. What are some of the most important legal principles established in those cases? QUESTION2: Ming, Mya and Naz are friends who met at college. After graduation, they established a small proprietary company called Yazoo which supplies computer products to technology retailers. The three of them are executive directors...
a) Why would a borrower choose to finance with a bond issue instead of a share...
a) Why would a borrower choose to finance with a bond issue instead of a share issue? b) What are the general benefits and risks to an investor of investing in a bond compared to investing in a share? c) Like any other financial markets, bond issuers constantly develop and introduce innovative instruments with new features. List and explain three important innovations in the bond markets, in terms of what they are, when were they developed and are they likely...
Question: Why would a company choose to issue bonds instead of issuing stock?
  Question: Why would a company choose to issue bonds instead of issuing stock?
Why would an individual choose an LLC instead of LLP for their business?. Describe the duties...
Why would an individual choose an LLC instead of LLP for their business?. Describe the duties that Members owe to an LLC. Is this duty different based on the type of LLC?
Explain why an increasing number of people choose to cohabit instead of marriage; state your position...
Explain why an increasing number of people choose to cohabit instead of marriage; state your position on if you personally agree or disagree in cohabitation.
why would one choose a fire tube boiler instead of a water tube boiler
why would one choose a fire tube boiler instead of a water tube boiler
Business Law Why would an entrepreneur choose an LLC or S-Corp?
Business Law Why would an entrepreneur choose an LLC or S-Corp?
How would you define health? Why would you define it that way?
How would you define health? Why would you define it that way?
why people choose nursing
why people choose nursing
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT