Question

subject...business ethics

Are some products too dangerous to be marketed in any circumstance? What regulations, if any, would you place on marketing cigarettes? Handguns? Prescription drugs? As a starting point, refer to The American Marketing Association’s Statement of Ethics, found at www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/Statement%20of%20Ethics.aspx which provides guidelines for marketing products. This code of ethics can be used to locate other codes and regulations that may address this issue.

answer in 200 words

Answer 1

Introduction

Some products are too hazardous to marketed in any circumstance. There are numerous items sold which can be delegated naturally risky. If one contemplates it, practically every item sold or and advertised if utilized as a part of the wrong way could be hurtful to oneself. Naturally hazardous items are those that regardless of the possibility that the purchaser uses it appropriately it can be hurtful. The offer of guns is an issue in light of the reality they may get into the wrong hands, yet I feel what is truly the issue is the advertising of weapons. They are depicted to be something that children believe is refreshing or enjoyable to have. This causes great problems since it is presently the kids that need the weapons yet they are the ones who abuse them.

Regulations

Until "2009" tobacco was the perfect most hazardous lawful item in the U.S. that was not governmentally controlled. For a considerable length of time, the tobacco business battled fiercely against all endeavors at control, regardless of heaps of confirmation that its items cause lung growth, coronary illness, respiratory sickness, malignancies of the bladder and a few another disease. One of the main formal tobacco directions was the Federal Trade Command's prerequisite in "1965" that all “cigarettes and tobacco” notices convey cautioning marks.

Gun producers have worked without government mistake for a considerable length of time. At the point when the Consumer Product Safety Command was made by Congress in "1972" to set wellbeing guidelines for most purchaser items, guns mainly avoided from "CPSC's" locale. Officials in the House of Representatives expected that permitting the "CPSC" to manage guns would make a tricky slant finishing with the office keeping guns out of the hands of well-behaved subjects.

The "FTC" passed different controls requiring the divulgence of “tobacco” fixings and more grounded wellbeing notices on cigarettes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco items. These checks were, for the most part, to reveal data about the tobacco item not direct the thing in any unusual way.