Question

In: Civil Engineering

two YouTube videos Electronic Armageddon NatGeo and 17 Misconceptions About The Effects Of An Electromagnetic Pulse...

two YouTube videos Electronic Armageddon NatGeo and 17 Misconceptions About The Effects Of An Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) and write a thoughtful full-page reaction paper to it.

Solutions

Expert Solution

1. Misconception 1: EMP Will Cause Every Exposed Electronic System to Cease Functioning.

2. EMP Effects Will Have Limited, Easily Recoverable, “Nuisance” Effects on Critical Infrastructure Systems.

3. Megaton- Nuclear Weapons Are Required to Cause Serious EMP Effects.

4. Protecting the Critical National Infrastructure Would Be Cost Prohibitive.

5. Only Late-Time EMP (E3) Will Damage Electric Power-Grid

6. Fiber-Optic Networks Are Not Susceptible to EMP Effects.

7. EMP will burn out every exposed electronic system.

8. EMP effects will be very limited and only result in “nuisance” effects in critical infrastructure systems.

9. Megatclass weapons are needed to cause any serious EMP effects – low yield, “entry-level” weapons do not engender serious EMP effects.

10. To protect our critical national infrastructure would cost a large fraction of the GNP.

11. Only late-time EMP (E3), not E1 will damage electric power grid transformers.

12. Long-haul fiber optic lines are invulnerable to EMP.

13. Ground burst EMP effects are limited to 2-5 km from a nuclear explosion where blast, thermal and radiation effects dominate.

14. Faraday cages need grounding.

15. Planes will fallout of the sky.

16. EMP destroy solar panels.

17. Cars really comes to an halt.


Related Solutions

1) Go to Youtube and write 15 observations on these two videos (What is the Erie...
1) Go to Youtube and write 15 observations on these two videos (What is the Erie Canal? (History) 10 minutes and 1 second) and (Erie Canal Locks Time Lapse (5 minutes and 16 seconds).
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT