In: Operations Management
Explain the Hersey Blanchard Situational Leadership Model. Explain each of the different components, including each leadership styles and follower readiness. Use an example in your description.
Managers and CEOs search for the best leadership style and model, while research and data show that there may be no single leadership strategy that may fit all kinds of scenarios and situations. Therefore, the successful leaders may adapt to the situations and respond to the unique scenarios through modulating their behaviors and practices and by analyzing other elements of the scenario.
The Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard “Situational Leadership” model explores the amount of social-emotional support or “relationship behavior”, and the direction or “task behavior” a leader on manager should provide in response to a given situation. The model is also based on evaluating the amount of readiness of the followers. A correlation between these two aspects that may be unique for given situations may help in finding out the right leadership style and pathways for the managers.
Task Behavior or Relationship Behavior
While some managers can be viewed to be more authoritarian, others
can be seen as more participative. In the same way, managers can be
seen as more production-oriented or more employee-oriented. The
scale can accommodate different managers that can value different
aspects to varying degrees. When a manager or leader engages in
one-way communication and restricts himself to explaining the task
to the followers, he/she is displaying “task behavior”.
Relationship behavior involves two-way communication between the
leader and the follower and may also include social-emotional
support, facilitating behavior, and certain motivations and
reinforcements that can be called psychological strokes. The
relationship behavior can be classified as:
a. High-Relationship, Low-Task Behavior
b. High-Task, High-Relationship Behavior
c. Low-Relationship, Low-Task Behavior
d. High-Task, Low-Relationship
Level of Readiness of the Followers
The level of readiness of a follower also has special importance in the situational leadership style. The level of readiness here is the willingness and ability of an employee to take responsibility for directing his/her behavior and actions. However, the variable has to be seen in terms of the particular task that is to be performed. People may be able to guide themselves to varying degrees for various kinds of jobs due to their own experiences, skills, expertise, or other factors. The total level of readiness is therefore never absolute or taken in a total sense. For instance, a sales representative may be more ready to direct his actions for making a sales pitch, a sales presentation, and/or sales calls, but would at be a low readiness level when it comes to writing advertising messages. Therefore, the manager would provide more direction to the representative for writing the advertisement messages, and less for making the sales calls.
In due course of time when the employee gains more expertise in new
areas that he has not been adequately exposed to before, the
manager would reduce the intensity of his task behavior and will
indulge in relationship behavior more. At even more later stages,
both task behavior and relationship behavior are reduced by the
manager and the employer now is confident and committed himself
enough to chase the goal and to direct himself accurately. At later
stages the employee does not require much reinforcement and
motivation, he can generate these psychological strokes by himself.
With an increase in trust, a delegation of responsibilities and
power increases. Therefore, the situational leadership model
correlates the effectiveness of leadership style with the level of
readiness of the follower.
A manager or leader can choose the right leadership style by
knowing the readiness level of the follower for the given task that
is being accomplished. As we can see, when a manager or leader is
displaying low relationship behavior, it does not mean that the
leadership is unfriendly. It just means that at that level of
guidance the particular behavior is more appropriate and
productive. With regard to the Hershey-Blanchard situational
leadership model, the leadership styles of situational leadership
may include:
a. Telling style- the leader provides explicit and clear directions
and also carries out close supervision in low-relationship
high-task style leadership. The maturity level of followers may be
the least here.
b. Selling style- the leader will attempt to sell and forward
his ideas to the employee group and will be highly persuasive in
explaining his direction. It is a high-relationship high-task style
of leadership where the followers may have the ability for doing
the job but may be unwilling to so.
c. Participating style- this is a high-relationship low-task style
of leadership with an emphasis on sharing the decisions and ideas.
Followers here are not experienced or confident to pursue the
direction.
d. Delegating style- the style is used with the high maturity
followers and is a low-relationship low-task leadership style. The
group here is mature and will take responsibility for the
decisions.