Question

In: Psychology

In the second moral argument of Ann Garry’s passage, pornography is said to “not treat women...

In the second moral argument of Ann Garry’s passage, pornography is said to “not treat women as whole persons but as mere sex objects ‘to be exploited and manipulated sexually.’” Despite this mistreatment, women and even young girls are interested in entering the porn industry every year. There are many reasons for this such as needing work, wanting “fame”, desires etc, among many more reasons. I’m not here to judge these reasons but rather to comment on the mistreatment of women once they leave the porn industry. For example, struggling to find work back in society because of the stigma around their time in the pornography industry. Do you think denying a woman work is justifiable if she was previously a porn star? Why or why not? please answer in 150-170 words.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Every individual regardless of their gender identity must have the freedom to choose their jobs taken into consideration that their jobs are not something which is hurting others. Por*n industry is a widely distributed industry having a high range of actors and actresses all over the world and most of them are working there by their own choice.

I don't think it is justified to deny a woman some jobs just because she was a por*nstar once. Her being a por*nstar was completely her own choice and that is a legal job. Now, there are certain areas where giving jobs to a por*nstar might lead to certain problems. For example, if a woman who was a por*nstar starts working as a counselor then there are high chances that clients who knew her from por*ns may get distracted and the healing process may not happen properly. In these areas where there are elements of interaction with other's and distraction to these interactions may interrupt the process, jobs might be justifiably denied. Being said that there are various other jobs where these kinds of distractions won't be an interruption to the process like a bank, and there jobs must be provided and denying jobs to these women is not justified. Thus, I guess the recruiters must not deny these women jobs just because they were por*nstars but must help them in getting those jobs where they can excel and where there public image won't be a distraction. Finally, jobs in acting industry is highly suitable for these women and denying those jobs are again just not justified.


Related Solutions

A. Decide whether each passage should be thought of as containing no argument, one argument, or...
A. Decide whether each passage should be thought of as containing no argument, one argument, or more than one argument. For each argument, determine whether it is simple or complex (whether it contains only one or more than one inference), pick out any premise or conclusion indicators, and identify each premise and conclusion. example: 1. The snow is making driving conditions very dangerous. But I must still go out and vote, even though my candidate has no chance of winning....
Philosophy 6.2 Write a response to this passage sp An argument is a list of statements,...
Philosophy 6.2 Write a response to this passage sp An argument is a list of statements, one of which is the conclusion and the others are the premises or assumptions of the argument. The parts that make up an argument are consistency, validity, and soundness. Consistency is ensuring that all parts of the line of reasoning contribute to the conclusion. Validity is a statement of the arguments and lastly soundness is a property of both arguments and the statements in...
Consider the following passage: The first and most manifest way is the argument from motion. It...
Consider the following passage: The first and most manifest way is the argument from motion. It is certain and evident to our senses that some things are in motion. Whatever is in motion is moved by another.... For 'motion' means the reduction of something from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality. But a thing can be reduced from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality only by something already in a state of actuality.... It...
The following passage contains an argument that commits at least one informal fallacy. Name the type...
The following passage contains an argument that commits at least one informal fallacy. Name the type of fallacy committed and explain why the passage is an example of that type. That biscotti ought to be good—I used only the best ingredients in it.
What is an example of moral argument you might encounter in the field of nursing.
What is an example of moral argument you might encounter in the field of nursing.
Reconstruct Singer’s argument in support of the claim that affluent nations have a moral obligation to...
Reconstruct Singer’s argument in support of the claim that affluent nations have a moral obligation to provide financial assistance to extremely poor nations. What is John Arthur’s objection to Singer’s argument. Be sure to identify which premise, if any, in Singer’s argument he rejects. What is Garrett Hardin’s objection to Singer? Be sure to state and explain which premise in Singer’s argument Hardin would object to. Finally, state (and explain) who makes the better of the two objections.
(Multiple Select). First, indicate whether the following is an argument or not. Second, if it is...
(Multiple Select). First, indicate whether the following is an argument or not. Second, if it is an argument identify the conclusion. "Ethics is a matter of opinion. Different people and cultures have different beliefs about whether actions like stealing are right or wrong." Group of answer choices Yes, this is an argument. "Atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased substantially..." is the conclusion "it is likely that global warming is the result of burning fossil fuels" is the concluison No, this is...
Why does Beauvoir call women the second sex?
Why does Beauvoir call women the second sex?
The notion “comparable moral significance” is very important to Singer’s argument. He leaves it “unexamined.”to begin...
The notion “comparable moral significance” is very important to Singer’s argument. He leaves it “unexamined.”to begin with, what is it, and what role does it play in his argument? Further; what, in our lives in the year 2014, might we sacrifice, that would not really be of comparable moral significance to the suffering (from absolute poverty) we might prevent? Remember, as always, to be civil and respectful in your discussion, especially with those expressing views you may strongly disagree with.
in regards to the twelve tables how did roman law treat women in comparison to men?...
in regards to the twelve tables how did roman law treat women in comparison to men? what did this difference mean for roman society? in what ways did these laws protect the roman idea of patriarchy or the rule of the oldest male within a family?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT