Assume a two-country, two-good, two-input model. Let the countries in the model be the United States...

Assume a two-country, two-good, two-input model. Let the countries in the model be the United States and the Rest of the World and the goods be steel and wheat. The two factors of production are capital and land. Further, the United States is capital-abundant and steel production is capital-intensive. Suppose, in the absence of trade, the United States operates at a point on its production possibility curve where it produces and consumes 20 units of wheat and 20 units of steel. Once it engages in free trade, the international price of one unit of steel is two units of wheat. In response to the opening of trade, the United States moves along its production-possibility curve to a new point where it produces 30 units of steel and 10 units of wheat. Is the United States better off following the opening of trade? Illustrate with a diagram and provide a clear explanation for your answer

Solutions

Expert Solution

Rahul Sunny answered 2 weeks ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Assume that there are exactly two countries: The United States and Australia. Also assume that these...

Assume that there are exactly two countries: The United States and Australia. Also assume that these countries’ economies are closed (i.e. they do not trade or otherwise interact with each other) with one notable exception: The U.S. exports plastic to Australia, and Australia exports iron ore to the U.S. For this question, I will abbreviate the currency of the U.S. as USD and that of Australia as AUD. a.Suppose that the U.S. imports 100,000 tons of iron at a price...

Consider the world with two countries: Country A and Country B. There are two states of...

Consider the world with two countries: Country A and Country B. There are two states of the world: State 1 and State 2. In State 1, output of Country A is $100 billion, and output of Country B is $80 billion. In State 2, output of Country A is $70 billion, and output of Country B is $120 billion. Assume that the share of labor income in output is 70% for Country A and 60% for Country B, respectively. a.)Derive...

Assume a two country (home and foreign) and a two good (agricultural good and manufacturing good)...

Assume a two country (home and foreign) and a two good (agricultural good and manufacturing good) model. Suppose that labor (only mobile factor) is used in both the industries, but land is specific to agriculture, and capital is specific to manufacturing. Use the specific factors model to briefly explain the existence of sweatshops in the foreign country that has a comparative advantage in the agricultural good.

1. The multiminus?good (2minus? country) model differs from the two country, two product model, in that...

1. The multiminus?good (2minus? country) model differs from the two country, two product model, in that in the former, A. full specialization is less likely to hold in equilibrium. B. the relative wage ratio will determine the pattern of trade ( which good is exported by which country. C. one cannot determine which country will export which product given only labor productivity data. D. All of the above. E. None of the above. 2. f transportation costs are especially high...

The United States has a low trade level compared to a country like Japan. If countries...

The United States has a low trade level compared to a country like Japan. If countries could not trade, what would happen to the living standards in those countries with low trade levels, like the United States, as well as in countries with high trade levels such as Japan? Cite at least one current example in your discussion.

Consider the trade relations between the United States and China. Assume the leaders of the countries...

Consider the trade relations between the United States and China. Assume the leaders of the countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are as follows. If both countries impose low tariffs, then both countries will gain $60 billion. If both countries impose high tariffs, then both countries will gain $40 billion. If one country imposes high tariffs, the country that has high imposed tariffs will gain $50 billion and the country that imposes low tariffs will receive $20 billion....

Consider two countries, the United States (U.S.) and Japan. In the U.S., there are two firms,...

Consider two countries, the United States (U.S.) and Japan. In the U.S., there are two firms, Pikes Peak Steel (PPS) and General Motors (GM), both owned by U.S. citizens. In Japan, there is one firm, Toyota, owned by Japanese citizens. All of the employees of PPS and GM are U.S. citizens and all of the employees of Toyota are Japanese citizens. In a given year, PPS produces $6000 worth of steel and pays wages of $1500. It sells $2000 worth...

Assume that the United States invests heavily in government and corporate securities of Country K. In...

Assume that the United States invests heavily in government and corporate securities of Country K. In addition, residents of Country K invest heavily in the United States. Approxi-mately $10 billion worth of investment transactions occur between these two countries each year. The total dollar value of trade transactions per year is about $8 million. This information is expected to also hold in the future. Because your firm exports goods to Country K, your job as international cash manager requires you...

Assume that the United States invests in government and corporate securities of Country K. In addition,...

Assume that the United States invests in government and corporate securities of Country K. In addition, residents of Country K invest in the United States. Approximately $8 billion worth of investment transactions occur between these two countries each year. The total dollar value of trade transactions per year is about $12 million. This information is expected to also hold in the future. Because your firm exports goods to Country K, your job as international cash manager requires you to forecast...

Suppose there are two countries in the world: Canada and the United States. Power plants in...

Suppose there are two countries in the world: Canada and the United States. Power plants in the United States mid-west burning high-sulphur coal contributes to the acidification of lakes in Canada. Explain by using a diagram, if the two countries do nothing to reduce pollution, then there is a loss in economic efficiency.

Subjects