Question

Please share your thoughts.

1. Is there a problem with the duty-based desire to seek absolute moral rules?

2. what do you think of the important duty-based ethics places on intentions?

(Ethics)

Answer 1

Representing the purpose of obligation is: acting without personal circumstance and acting without worry for results. Acting without tendency [downplays the job of compassion]

Prior to Kant, morals concentrated on the idea of "the great", two inquiries were posed: What is "the acceptable" and How would we accomplish it? There was no difference on the over two focuses. The main riddle was the reason a few people didnt focus on the great. [Plato said "obliviousness". Aristotle said shortcoming of will.

In the Christian view, to act ethically an individual must see the demonstration is correct (i.e., it is told by GOD) and must do the demonstration since they see it is correct. For Kant, reason, not God, is the wellspring of the ethical law. We can reword the above as:

To act ethically an individual must see the demonstration is correct (i.e., it is instructed by REASON) and should do the demonstration since they see it is correct.

The "cooperative attitude" and obligation…

Kant put his on the map articulation that there is nothing on the planet or even out of it that can be called acceptable without capability aside from a cooperative attitude. Characteristics of character (mind, insight, fortitude, and so forth.) or characteristics of favorable luck (riches, status, great wellbeing) might be utilized to either fortunate or unfortunate purposes. Information is acceptable, however whenever utilized by a double crosser in his foul play will demonstrate awful on the grounds that the deceiver needs cooperative attitude. By cooperative attitude, Kant doesn't mean only a craving or ambiguous wish that could conceivably prompt activity however what he implied was the firm reason and fixed want to accomplish something great. Kant accepted that solitary a cooperative attitude is ethically significant. A positive attitude recognizes what its obligation is (that is, the cooperative attitude realizes what reason orders it to do.). Kant contends that a few characteristics are useful to the positive attitude, for example, balance, poise are a MEANS to (accomplish) a cooperative attitude. A cooperative attitude is naturally acceptable regardless of whether its endeavors neglect to achieve positive results.The cooperative attitude is to be decided by its intention alone.

Ethical quality is situated in the idea of opportunity, or independence. Somebody with a free or independent will doesn't just act yet can reflect and conclude whether to act in a given manner. This demonstration of consultation recognizes a self-sufficient will from a heteronomous will directed by outside wants.

Kant presumes that the genuine capacity of reason is to deliver a will that is acceptable.

.

The "Cooperative attitude" and Duty

In the event that somebody inadvertently come clean. It isn't sufficient that the demonstration is INTENDED: If somebody is moved by an unexpected sentiment of pity, the demonstration is still without virtue.

The Motive of Duty

It is almost difficult to track down instances of unadulteratedgood activities. Almost every activity we watch can be credited to some intrigue or inspiration other than unadulterated profound quality. This ought not debilitate us, for moral standards originate from reason, not as a matter of fact. In reality, moral standards couldn't emerge out of understanding, for all encounters rely upon specific conditions, while moral standards must have total legitimacy,