Question

In: Finance

4. Diversification can eliminate risk if two events are perfectly negatively correlated. Suppose that two firms...

4. Diversification can eliminate risk if two events are perfectly negatively correlated. Suppose that two firms are competing for a government contract and have an equal chance of winning. Because only one firm can win, the other must lose, so the two events are perfectly negatively correlated. You can buy a share of stock in either firm for $20. The stock of the firm that wins the contract will worth $40, while the stock of the loser will worth $10. • If you buy two shares of one firm, calculate the expected value and variance of two shares. • If you buy one share on each firm, calculate the expected value and variance of two shares.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer:-

Let the two company's be A and B.

Given:-

Price of stock A or B= $20
The sock of the company that wins the contract = $ 40
The stock of the company that looses the contract= $ 10
The probability of winning ii equal for both companies ie P(A) = P(B) = 0.5

1) If we buy two share of one firm the expected return is:-

In this scenario
we purchased two shares of one firm and it won the contract or it lose the contract

Therefore the profit in case of winning the contract = $ 40 ($40+$40-$20-$20)
The loss in case of loosing the contract = -$ 20 ($10+$10-$20-$20)

The expected return (E)= 0.5( $40) + 0.5(-$20)
= $ 20 - $ 10
  E = $ 10

X P(X) X* P(X) (X-E)^2 *P(X)
Win Contract 40 0.5 20 (40-10)^2 * (0.5) = 450
Loose Contract -20 0.5 -10 (-20-10)^2 * (0.5)= 450

Therefore variance = 450 +450= 900

2) If we buy one share of each company then
If we win the contract = $40+$10-$20-$20= $10
If we lose the contract= $40 +$10-$20-$20= $ 10

Expected return= $10(0.5) + $10(0.5)= $10

X P(X) X*P(X) (X-E)^2 * P(X)
Win Contract 10 0.5 5 (10-10)^2 * (0.5) = 0
Loose Contract 10 0.5 5 (10-10)^2 * (0.5) = 0


Therefore Variance = 0


Related Solutions

Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that r_m= 0.07,...
Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that r_m= 0.07, r_n= 0.20,σ_m=0.12 , and σ_n=0.5. Assuming that there are no arbitrage opportunities, by using the Goal Seek function (excel) calculate the weight (proportion) of the two assets that produce the lowest portfolio variance? (Use the Goal Seek function)
Question 2 Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that...
Question 2 Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that ?=0.07, ? ?= 0.20,?= 0.12 , and ?= 0.5. Assuming that there are no arbitrage opportunities, by using ??? the Goal Seek function (excel) calculate the weight (proportion) of the two assets that produce the lowest portfolio variance? (Use the Goal Seek function) MAYBANK Years Share price Dividends 2010 MYR 8.500 0.4400 2011 MYR 8.700 0.3600 2012 MYR 8.200 0.3300 2013 MYR 8.880 0.3100...
Diversification is “combining negatively correlated assets to reduce, or diversify, risk.” Do you think your investments...
Diversification is “combining negatively correlated assets to reduce, or diversify, risk.” Do you think your investments are adequately diversified? Why or why not? What can you apply from this to improve your personal financial health and lower your risk or increase your return?
In most cases, diversification can reduce or eliminate this type of risk. A. systematic risk. B....
In most cases, diversification can reduce or eliminate this type of risk. A. systematic risk. B. nonsystematic. C. macro risk D. all risk.
Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate...
Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate of return of 16% and a standard deviation of return of 22%. B has an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of return of 24%. The weight of security B in the minimum-variance portfolio is _________. a 62.01% b 47.83% c 45.75% d 43.84%
y=a+bx b <0 prove that x and y are perfectly negatively correlated
y=a+bx b <0 prove that x and y are perfectly negatively correlated
In Bermuda there are no corporate income taxes. Consider two Bermuda firms with perfectly correlated earnings....
In Bermuda there are no corporate income taxes. Consider two Bermuda firms with perfectly correlated earnings. The first is Debt Galore and the second is Debt Zero. Each company is expected to earn $35 million (before interest) in perpetuity. All these earnings are distributed as interest or dividend. Debt Galore has $150 million of perpetual risk free debt. The interest on this debt is 7%. It has 1.5 million shares priced at $115 per share. Debt Zero has no debt....
Diversification eliminates idiosyncratic (unique or firm-specific) risk but does not eliminate systematic risk. Evaluate this statement....
Diversification eliminates idiosyncratic (unique or firm-specific) risk but does not eliminate systematic risk. Evaluate this statement. What happens to the benefits of diversification as portfolios get larger? Why do you think there are changes to the benefits of diversification as portfolios get larger?
Consider two perfectly positively correlated risky securities, A and B
Consider two perfectly positively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate of return of 16% and a standard deviation of return of 20%. B has an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of return of 30%. Solve for the minimum variance portfolio (i.e., what are the weights in A and B of the minimum variance portfolio). What is the variance of this portfolio?
Explain how can the diversification reduce risk?
Explain how can the diversification reduce risk?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT