Question

In: Finance

Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that r_m= 0.07,...

Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that r_m= 0.07, r_n= 0.20,σ_m=0.12 , and σ_n=0.5.

Assuming that there are no arbitrage opportunities, by using the Goal Seek function (excel) calculate the weight (proportion) of the two assets that produce the lowest portfolio variance? (Use the Goal Seek function)

Solutions

Expert Solution

The return of a portfolio is the weighted return of the two stocks

The standard deviation of a portfolio is given by

Where Wi is the weight of the security i,

is the standard deviation of returns of security i.

and is the correlation coefficient between returns of security i and security j

Using Excel Goal Seek. the weights are 0.808 for M and 0.192 for N

Exact weights can be found by minimum variance portfolio weights formula  

The formula for minimum risk weights in a two stock S and Stock B portfolio is

Let S be M and B be N, since correlation coefficient is -1

So, WS = (0.5^2-0.5*0.12 *(-1)) / ( 0.5^2+0.12^2 -2*0.5*0.12 *(-1))

= 0.806452 = 80.65%

and WB = 1-   WS = 1-0.8065 =0.1935=19.35%

So, proportion of M in lowest variance portfolio is 0.8065 or 80.65%

& proportion of N in lowest variance portfolio is 0.1935 or 19.35%


Related Solutions

Question 2 Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that...
Question 2 Suppose that the annual returns on two shares are perfectly negatively correlated and that ?=0.07, ? ?= 0.20,?= 0.12 , and ?= 0.5. Assuming that there are no arbitrage opportunities, by using ??? the Goal Seek function (excel) calculate the weight (proportion) of the two assets that produce the lowest portfolio variance? (Use the Goal Seek function) MAYBANK Years Share price Dividends 2010 MYR 8.500 0.4400 2011 MYR 8.700 0.3600 2012 MYR 8.200 0.3300 2013 MYR 8.880 0.3100...
4. Diversification can eliminate risk if two events are perfectly negatively correlated. Suppose that two firms...
4. Diversification can eliminate risk if two events are perfectly negatively correlated. Suppose that two firms are competing for a government contract and have an equal chance of winning. Because only one firm can win, the other must lose, so the two events are perfectly negatively correlated. You can buy a share of stock in either firm for $20. The stock of the firm that wins the contract will worth $40, while the stock of the loser will worth $10....
Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate...
Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate of return of 16% and a standard deviation of return of 22%. B has an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of return of 24%. The weight of security B in the minimum-variance portfolio is _________. a 62.01% b 47.83% c 45.75% d 43.84%
y=a+bx b <0 prove that x and y are perfectly negatively correlated
y=a+bx b <0 prove that x and y are perfectly negatively correlated
Consider two perfectly positively correlated risky securities, A and B
Consider two perfectly positively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate of return of 16% and a standard deviation of return of 20%. B has an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of return of 30%. Solve for the minimum variance portfolio (i.e., what are the weights in A and B of the minimum variance portfolio). What is the variance of this portfolio?
In this exercise, we examine the effect of combining investments with positively correlated risks, negatively correlated...
In this exercise, we examine the effect of combining investments with positively correlated risks, negatively correlated risks, and uncorrelated risks. A firm is considering a portfolio of assets. The portfolio is comprised of two assets, which we will call ''A" and "B." Let X denote the annual rate of return from asset A in the following year, and let Y denote the annual rate of return from asset B in the following year. Suppose that E(X) = 0.15 and E(Y)...
In this exercise, we examine the effect of combining investments with positively correlated risks, negatively correlated...
In this exercise, we examine the effect of combining investments with positively correlated risks, negatively correlated risks, and uncorrelated risks. A firm is considering a portfolio of assets. The portfolio is comprised of two assets, which we will call ''A" and "B." Let X denote the annual rate of return from asset A in the following year, and let Y denote the annual rate of return from asset B in the following year. Suppose that E(X) = 0.15 and E(Y)...
Suppose that assets 1 and 2 are 24% correlated and have the following expected returns and...
Suppose that assets 1 and 2 are 24% correlated and have the following expected returns and standard deviations: Asset E(R) σ 1 14% 9% 2 8% 4% a) Calculate the expected return and standard deviation for a portfolio consisting of equal weights in assets 1 and 2. b) What are the weights of a minimum variance portfolio consisting of assets 1 and 2? What is the expected return and standard deviation of this portfolio? c) Has there been an improvement...
In Bermuda there are no corporate income taxes. Consider two Bermuda firms with perfectly correlated earnings....
In Bermuda there are no corporate income taxes. Consider two Bermuda firms with perfectly correlated earnings. The first is Debt Galore and the second is Debt Zero. Each company is expected to earn $35 million (before interest) in perpetuity. All these earnings are distributed as interest or dividend. Debt Galore has $150 million of perpetual risk free debt. The interest on this debt is 7%. It has 1.5 million shares priced at $115 per share. Debt Zero has no debt....
Suppose that m = 2, and that the p-values for the two tests are positively correlated,...
Suppose that m = 2, and that the p-values for the two tests are positively correlated, so that if one is small then the other will tend to be small as well, and if one is large then the other will tend to be large. How does the family-wise error rate associated with these m = 2 tests qualitatively compare to the answer in (b) with m = 2? In (b), FWER = 1-(1-alpha)^m
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT