In: Psychology
2. A 7-year-old Virginia boy set fire to a building. As a result of the blaze, a 66-year-old woman died. The boy was charged with second-degree murder. Could the boy be morally responsible for the crime of murder? If so, what circumstances might increase or diminish his responsibility? discuss this situation.
The 7 year old boy did commit a crime that led to the death of a 66 year old woman. However, at the age of 7, morals, ethics and pronciples are not developed in children. Understanding moralistic behaviors takes a few more years and a solid comprehension can only be achieved in adulthood. Therefore, a case can be made that the boy did not know what he was doing and the consequences that his actions would cause. He did not know it is unlawful to set fire to any public or private property. It should also be investigated whether he did this n purpose or accidently. Either way, he can not be tried as an adult and will need to be punished as a minor. Hence, the punishment for the crime will decrease and he will be sent to a juvenile prison or system. It can be argued that if he is not made o tunderstand the consequences and his responsibility in this, he might not undertand the gravity of the situation. This can be done through therapy. He will need to go for therapy so as to comprehend the severity of the crime he has commited.