In: Nursing
***A 7-year-old Virginia boy set fire to a building. As a result of the blaze, a 66-year-old woman died. The boy was charged with second-degree murder. Could the boy be morally responsible for the crime of murder? If so, what circumstances might increase or diminish his responsibility?
***Five New Jersey teenagers were drinking beer by the railroad tracks near their home when they heard a train approaching. They decided to throw a track switch and sent the train careening off the tracks, down a siding, and through the brick wall of a building. The crash killed the engineer, critically injured one passenger, and caused an estimated $5.5 million in property damage. Discuss the teenagers’ moral responsibility for their act in light of the circumstances in which it took place.
No, the boy can not be morally responsible for the crime of
murder. the children under 10 years can not be arrested or charged
with their crime. As per the juvenile justice system, juveniles are
not matured, they don't know what is right or wrong, they don't
know the reason for their action. children must have responsibility
for their actions. when they are not developed with the sense of
morality they should be taught. society, poor parents' guidance,
schooling practice, circumstances, experiences, and traits result
of many factors like genetic makeup outside the persons
control.
children between 10 and 17 can be arrested and taken them to court
if they charged with their crimes. youth court deals with offenses
they made. moral responsibility encourages offenders to address
their past behavior and to become responsible in the future. they
have a moral responsibility for their future. Moral responsibility
needs free will, hard determine to cause immoral action. morality
prevents crimes. teenagers moral education and social empowerment
and cognitive development improve their self control.