In: Economics
QUESTION 1
Payback period is the length of time needed for the sum alternative's costs and benefits at a given interest rate to equal zero (0).
True
False
QUESTION 2
When evaluating mutually-exclusive alternatives using B-C Ratio analysis, the alternative with the greatest B-C ratio is the most advantageous.
True
False
QUESTION 3
A discounted payback period is shorter than a non-discounted payback period because it doesn't assume a zero interest rate.
True
False
QUESTION 4
Timothy has a classic sports car that he bought in 2005 for $35,000. What type of analysis should he use to determine the car's estimated value in 2030?
Present Worth |
||
Benefit-Cost Ratio |
||
Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth |
||
Future Worth |
QUESTION 5
Which of the following statements does NOT describe an economically viable alternative?
1. |
The Present Worth of the costs divided by the Present Worth of the benefits is greater than 1. |
|
2. |
The Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost divided by the Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth is less than 1. |
|
3. |
The Benefit-Cost Ratio is equal to or greater than 1. |
|
4. |
The Present Worth of the costs minus the Present Worth of the benefits is less than 0. |
Answer 1
Payback period is the time required for the recovery of all cost through benefits. The recovery happens when the cumulative cashflow of the discounted cashflow at a given interest rate is equal to zero.
Hence the statement is TRUE
Answer 2
B/ C ratio represent the Benefits over the cost. Hemce higher the B/C ratio more preferred is the project.
Hemce statement is TRUE
Answer 3
When the interest rate is higher the discounted cashflow is lower hence the cumulative cashflow will take longer time to reach zero. Hence the discounted payback period is longer than non discounted cashflow.
Hence statement is FALSE.
Answer 4
Since we know the value at 2005 (present) and we need value in 2030 (future) and it is a one time payment.
Hence Future Worth analysis is required
Hence LAST OPTION is correct
Answer 5
When PW of cost / PW of benefit is more than 1 means that the PW of cost is more than the PW of benefits. Hence it is not an economically viable option
Equivalent uniform annual cost divided by equivalent uniform annual worth is less than 1 means equivalent annual cost is more than equivalent uniform annual worth. Hence is is also not viable
Benefit cost ratio is more than 1 means benefits are more than cost hence project is viable
PW of cost less PW of benefit is less than 0 means PW of cost is more than PW of benefits hence option is not viable
Hence 1,2 and 4 are not viable