Question

In: Finance

. Simson and Simpson, Inc. with its WACC of 10% has two investment proposals with the...

. Simson and Simpson, Inc. with its WACC of 10% has two investment proposals with the following characteristics:
​____________________________________________________________________________
​​​PROJECT A​​​PROJECT B
​__________________________​​_________________________
​Period ICO Cash Flows ICO Cash Flows
​____________________________________________________________________________
​ 0​​ $(9,000)​ -​$(12,000)​ -
​ 1​​​$5,000​ $5,000
​ 2​​​$4,000​ $5,000
​ 3​​​$3,000​ ​ $8,000
____________________________________________________________________________
(A).​Compute the internal rate of return for Projects A & B. (5)
(B).​On a graph draw the net present value profiles for each project using 5 discount rates. (5)
(C).​Identify the crossover point. What is the significance of this point? Which project should be accepted, why? (5)
(D).​Explain the difference between incremental cost and opportunity cost. What are sunk costs and should we consider ​them when making capital budgeting decisions? Why

Solutions

Expert Solution

A) To calculate IRR we put Outflow= Inflow

So for project A we have 9000= (5000/(1+r))+(4000/(1+r)2)+(3000/(1+r)3)

Now by Trial & Error method we can find out the IRR

Like replace r with 15% we get inflow as 9344 but we want it to be near 9000 so again we put 17% we get 9168 we can put r = 18% we get 8935 so r is between 17 and 18 % so by interpolation also we can get otherwise by Trial and error if we do r is coming approx 17.5%

If we do Interpolation

x-17/18-17=(9000-9168)/(8935-9168) so we get 17.7 (approx)

Similarly for project B

Outflow = Inflow

12000=(5000/(1+r))+(5000/(1+r)2)+(8000/(1+r)3)

By trial and error we get

18% we get inflow 12697 but we want it to be equal to outflow so we keep trying by

20% we get 12268 try 21 we get 12063 approx

so we can take IRR at 21%

we can also do by interpolation as suggested earlier for Project A

2)Calculation of NPV at different discount rate(NPV=Present value of inflow -Outflow)

Discount rate Project A Project B Year Project A Project B
10% Rs. 1,105.18 Rs. 2,688.20 0 -9000 -12000
12% Rs. 788.40 Rs. 2,144.50 1 5000 5000
13% Rs. 636.52 Rs. 1,884.91 2 4000 5000
15% Rs. 344.95 Rs. 1,388.67 3 3000 8000
18% Rs. -64.08 Rs. 697.26

For graph we need to plot in x axis discount rate and y axis NPV

c)Crossover Point:Is the discount rate at which both the project will deliver same net present value.Crossover point helps managers help evaluate profit with respect to risk factors.

difference of outflow = Present value of difference of inflow

(12000-9000)=0/(1+r)+1000/(1+r)2+5000/(1+r)3

Again we have to use the method of IRR to calculate r.

at 21% its coming 3505

at 22.5% its coming 3386

at 24% its coming 3272

at 25% its coming 3200

at 27% its coming 3060

approx 27.2% by Trial and error

At this discount rate both project will present same NPV.

D)Incremental cost is the additional cost for an extra unit of output. Like we have to spend 5$ more to produce additional 1 output.

whereas Opportunity cost is the benefit we forgo when we put the same money in the other alternative like instead of spending we put the money in bank and get interest rate the interest which we have forgone is the opportunity cost.

Sunk cost are cost which have already taken place it plays no role in NPV thus these cost have already occurred and are irrelevant for capital budgeting purpose so we should not consider it .They are independent event and are not in particular to a project.Example: Last month Salary to staff this is not related to the project proposal its last month so should be ignored.


Related Solutions

Cummins Engines, Inc. is considering two alternative investment proposals. The first proposal calls for investment in...
Cummins Engines, Inc. is considering two alternative investment proposals. The first proposal calls for investment in plant and equipment to produce a new alternative fuel engine. The second proposal calls for investment in plant and equipment to expand production of a current, successful diesel engine. Cummins will choose only of these project since they are for similar markets. Year New Line Expand Line 0 ($65,000,000) ($20,000,000) 1 $20,000,000 $11,000,000 2 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 3 $20,000,000 $8,000,000 4 $20,000,000 $0 5 $20,000,000...
Contact Manufacturing, Inc is considering two alternative investment proposals. The first proposal Calls for a major...
Contact Manufacturing, Inc is considering two alternative investment proposals. The first proposal Calls for a major renovation of the company's manufacturing facility. The second involves replacing just a few obsolete pieces of equipment in the facility. The company will choose one project or the other this year, but it will not do both. The cash flows associated with each project appear below and the firm discounts project cash flows at 15%. Year Renovate Replace 0 -9,000,000 -2,400,000 1 3,000,000 2,000,000...
The following data are accumulated by Eco Labs, Inc. in evaluating two competing capital investment proposals:...
The following data are accumulated by Eco Labs, Inc. in evaluating two competing capital investment proposals: Testing Equipment Vehicle Amount of investment $56,000 $40,000 Useful life 4 years 5 years Estimated residual value 0 0 Estimated total income over the useful life $8,400 $10,500 Determine the expected average rate of return for each proposal. If required, round your answers to one decimal place. Testing Equipment % Vehicle %
Contract Manufacturing, Inc., is considering two alternative investment proposals. The first proposal calls for a major...
Contract Manufacturing, Inc., is considering two alternative investment proposals. The first proposal calls for a major renovation of the company’s manufacturing facility. The second involves replacing just a few obsolete pieces of equipment in the facility. The company will choose one project or the other but not both. The cash flows associated with each project appear below and the firm discounts project cash flow at 15%: Year: 0 ; 1 ; 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; 5 Renovate :...
Suppose a firm estimates its WACC to be 10%. Should the WACC be used to evaluate...
Suppose a firm estimates its WACC to be 10%. Should the WACC be used to evaluate all of its potential projects, even if they vary in risk? If not, what might be "reasonable" costs of capital for average-, high-, and low-risk projects?
Eolop company now has an investment plan which needs $5m. The company has two financing proposals....
Eolop company now has an investment plan which needs $5m. The company has two financing proposals. Plan A is to borrow $2m at 10% and $3m will need to sell stocks at $50 per common share. Plan B would involve higher financial leverage. $1m would be raised by selling bonds with an effective interest rate of 10% and the remaining $4 million would be raised by selling a common stock at the $50 price per share. The fixed operating cost...
Prime Financial Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals for a drive-up ATM kiosk, each requiring...
Prime Financial Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals for a drive-up ATM kiosk, each requiring an investment of $100,000 and each with an eight-year life and expected total net cash flows of $200,000. Location 1 is expected to provide equal annual net cash flows of $25,000, and Location 2 is expected to have the following unequal annual net cash flows: Year 1 $45,000 Year 5 $24,000 Year 2 34,000 Year 6 18,000 Year 3 21,000 Year 7 14,000 Year...
Your division is considering two projects. Its WACC is 10% (weighted average cost of capital, that...
Your division is considering two projects. Its WACC is 10% (weighted average cost of capital, that represent a firm’s cost of capital in which each category of capital is proportionately weighted), the projects’ after-tax cash flows (in millions of dollars) would be as follows: Project A 0 = - $30 1 = - $ 5 2 = $ 10 3 = $ 15 4 = 20 Project B 0 = - $ 30 1 = $ 20 2 = $10...
Garnet, Inc., has a target debt-equity ratio of 0.39. Its WACC is 11.7 %, and the...
Garnet, Inc., has a target debt-equity ratio of 0.39. Its WACC is 11.7 %, and the tax rate is 31 % If you know that the after-tax cost of debt is 5.8%, what is the cost of equity? (Report answer in percentage terms and round to 2 decimal places. Do not round intermediate calculations).
Garnet, Inc., has a target debt-equity ratio of 0.59. Its WACC is 11.4 %, and the...
Garnet, Inc., has a target debt-equity ratio of 0.59. Its WACC is 11.4 %, and the tax rate is 36 % If you know that the after-tax cost of debt is 6.5%, what is the cost of equity? (Report answer in percentage terms and round to 2 decimal places. Do not round intermediate calculations).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT