Question

One of the most well-known policy approaches to address the drug problem in the United States has been the “war on drugs” declared by President Nixon in 1971. Review the drug control efforts following this declaration and through the year 2000.

Respond to the following:

How did the “war on drugs” influence subsequent drug control policy in the United States?

Upon reflection of the costs and consequences of this drug war, was this an effective approach to dealing with the country’s drug problem?

Provide your sources.

Answer 1

The War on medicine may be a phrase wont to seek advice from a government-led initiative that aims to prevent prohibited drug use, distribution and trade by increasing and imposing penalties for offenders. The movement started within the Nineteen Seventies and remains evolving nowadays. Over the years, individuals have had mixed reactions to the campaign, starting from full-on support to claims that it's racist and political objectives.War on medicine may be a series of actions tending toward a prohibition of prohibited drug trade. it's a campaign adopted by the U.S. government together with the foreign military aid and with the help of taking part countries, to each outline and to finish the import, manufacture, sale, and use of prohibited medicine.. This initiative includes a group of U.S. drug policies that are planned to discourage the assembly, distribution, and consumption of prohibited mind-altering medicine. The term "War on Drugs" was initial employed by President President Nixon on Gregorian calendar month seventeen, 1971, throughout that he delineate prohibited medicine as "public enemy beloved within the us.".

In U.S., the war on medicine has given rise to variety of well-known anti-drug campaigns like the “Just Say No" campaign. The “just say no” campaign was started within the Eighties by initial girl Nancy United States President to create scool youngsters say "no" to anyone United Nations agency offered them medicine.

The us formally desires to push economic process, political stability, respect for human rights, and also the strengthening of democratic establishments throughout geographical region. significantly throughout the Bush administration, however, goals for the U.S. war on medicine were superimposed over these alternative objectives. an outsized quantity of proof indicates that U.S. drug management policy over the past many years has really been harmful to those alternative four U.S. goals for geographical region, that imply required changes in U.S. drug control policy.The impact of drug management operations on human rights has been equally harmful. U.S. security help to mountain chain countries has considerably increased their capabilities to hold out military and police operations. sadly, because the insurers of domestic order, resident police officers and military members are usually agents of repression. . Human rights abuses committed by internal security forces in these countries are systematically reported by teams like America's Watch and Amnesty International. In the presence of United States drug control agent throughout drug management operations has generally reportedly had a restraining impact on the brutality of foreign security agents, normally drug control programs hurt instead of enhance the respect for human rights in resident countries.
Conclusion: An understanding of wherever the US has been with relevancy its drug management strategy and its effects inside geographical region and on U.S. policy goals begs a crucial question. What ought to the US drug management strategy be within the future, and the way can this have an effect on future U.S. engagement of resident countries?The proven fact that centuries of enforcement has not eliminated criminal behavior isn't a justification to prevent fighting crime, and also the same reasoning applies to drug management. U.S. supply-side drug management efforts can not be abandoned, however definitely will and may be reduced and redirected toward demand-side drug programs. U.S. drug management strategy has traditionally enclosed the thought that a balanced approach is required to handle the availability still because the demand aspect of the illicit drug equation. Empirical analysis suggests that this balance has been not suitably weighted a lot of toward the availability aspect, however, and policymakers ought to correct this historical imbalance by focusing preponderantly on demand-side solutions.Finally, by sharply following habit hindrance and rehabilitation programs, the US will build serious advances in curb the harmful bravery of medicine that plagues all yank societies. it's time for a modification in U.S. drug management strategy, and every one the voters of ground stand to achieve from this call. According to me this was not as affective approach as it should have been...to to deal with the drug problem