In: Economics
a.
Selling price = $8
Profit = $240
The monopolist should capture the lowest willingness-to-pay for charging price. Compare to $10, the lowest willingness-to-pay is $8. Therefore, the price is $8. At this price, the product could be sold to both types of customers.
This price would give the highest profit.
Profit = Total revenue – Total costs
Profit at $10 price = 80 × $10 – 80 × $6 = 800 – 480 = $320 (profit, if customers are differentiated)
Profit at $8 price = (80 + 40 =) 120 × $8 – 120 × $6 = 960 – 720 = $240 (profit, if customers are not differentiated)
b.
Yes; there should be an advertisement, since it gives higher profit than $240.
Selling price is still $8, since the lowest willingness-to-pay should be captured because of non-differentiating between customers.
Profit at $8 price = (80 + 40 + 100 =) 220 × $8 – 220 × $6 + $80 = 1,760 – 1,400 = $360 (higher than earlier $240).
c.
The scenario:
Willingness to pay by A type = 10 + 1 = $11
Willingness to pay by B type = 8 + 1 = $9
Advertisement cost is still $80
New profit at $9 price = (80 + 40 =) 120 × $9 – 120 × $6 + 80 = 1,080 – 800 = $280
Since the new profit ($280) increases from the earlier profit ($240), the advertisement should be placed.
Since there is no differentiation between customers, the lowest willingness to pay should be the price because of keeping both types of customers. Selling price is $9.
Profit (as calculated above) is $280.