Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Part (a)Using the Experience and Income xlsx file, determine the sample correlation coefficient between the annual...

Part (a)Using the Experience and Income xlsx file, determine the sample correlation coefficient between the annual salary and the job market experience variables.

Part (b)Interpret the sample correlation coefficient you found in part (a)

Part (c)If we regressed income on experience, what share of the variation in income could be explained by the variation in experience? Explain how you found your answer.

Individuals' Annual Salaries and Job Market Experience
Annual Salary Years of Job Market Experience
83601 18
29736 47
50235 12
22133 10
21994 24
29390 18
17694 38
26795 44
19981 54
14476 3
19452 3
28168 17
19306 34
13318 25
25166 10
18121 18
13162 6
32094 14
16667 4
50171 39
31691 13
36178 40
15234 4
16817 26
22485 22
30308 10
11702 6
11186 0
12285 42
19284 3
11451 8
57623 31
25670 8
83443 5
49974 26
46646 44
31702 39
13312 9
44543 10
15013 21
33389 22
60626 7
24509 15
20852 38
30133 27
31799 25
16796 14
20793 6
29407 19
29191 9
15957 10
34484 28
35185 12
26614 19
41780 9
55777 21
15160 45
66738 29
33351 4
33498 20
29809 29
15193 15
23027 34
75165 12
18752 45
83569 29
32235 38
20852 1
13787 4
34746 15
17690 14
52762 7
60152 38
33461 7
13481 7
9879 28
16789 6
31304 26
37771 5
50187 24
39888 5
19227 15

Solutions

Expert Solution

(A) Enter the data values into column A and column B of excel from cell 1 to 83, where first cell labels.

Using CORREL function in excel and selecting annual salary as array1 and years of job market experience as array2, we get

=CORREL(A2:A83,B2:B83)

= 0.0833

(B) Correlation coefficient calculated in part (A) is r = 0.0833. This value is very close to 0, which means that there is very weak positive relationship between the annual salary and years of job market experience. There is positive relationship because the correlation coefficient is positive, but very small in magnitude.

(C) We know that coefficient of determination tells us about the percent of variation in dependent variable that is explained by independent variable and coefficient of determination or r squared value is given as

Coefficient of determination = r^2

setting r = 0.0833

we get, coefficient of determination = 0.0833^2 = 0.0069

this means that only 0.69% variation in income could be explained by the variation in experience.


Related Solutions

1. Part (a)            (1 point) Using the “Experience and Income.xlsx” file, determine the sample correlation coefficient...
1. Part (a)            (1 point) Using the “Experience and Income.xlsx” file, determine the sample correlation coefficient between the annual salary and the job market experience variables. You must submit your actual Excel file with the output as part of the assignment. Answer is in excel sheet Part (b)            (2 points) Interpret the sample correlation coefficient you found in part (a). Part (c)            (2 points) If we regressed income on experience, what share of the variation in income could be explained...
A positive correlation coefficient between years of job experience and salary would mean that: A) more...
A positive correlation coefficient between years of job experience and salary would mean that: A) more job experience gets same salary B) more job experience gets lower salary C) more job experience gets higher salary D) less job experience gets higher salary
Define correlation coefficient. Describe in your own words the difference between correlation coefficient and coefficient of...
Define correlation coefficient. Describe in your own words the difference between correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination.
6. What is the difference between the correlation coefficient and ?2? Why should the correlation coefficient...
6. What is the difference between the correlation coefficient and ?2? Why should the correlation coefficient be -1 and 1? 7. What is the utility of marginal effects in regression models? How are they obtained? 8. What is heterocedasticity and homocedasticity? Explain how to detect and correct the first.
Given the linear correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, determine the critical values of...
Given the linear correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, determine the critical values of r and use your finding to state whether or not the given r represents a significant linear correlation. Use a significance level of 0.05. r = 0.353, n = 15 A. Critical values: r = ±0.532, no significant linear correlation B. Critical values: r = ±0.514, significant linear correlation C. Critical values: r = ±0.514, no significant linear correlation D. Critical values: r =...
Given the linear correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, determine the critical values of...
Given the linear correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, determine the critical values of r and use your finding to state whether or not the given r represents a significant linear correlation. Use a significance level of 0.05. r = 0.127, n = 15
Use a scatterplot and the linear correlation coefficient r to determine whether there is a correlation...
Use a scatterplot and the linear correlation coefficient r to determine whether there is a correlation between the two variables. Use alphaequals0.05. x 6 1 4 8 5 y 5 0 2 7 4 Click here to view a table of critical values for the correlation coefficient. LOADING... Does the given scatterplot suggest that there is a linear​ correlation? A. Yes comma because the points appear to have a straight line pattern. B. ​Yes, because the data does not follow...
-Compute the sample correlation coefficient between the price and the number of flash drives sold. Also,...
-Compute the sample correlation coefficient between the price and the number of flash drives sold. Also, develop a least-squares estimated regression line. Price (x) Units sold (y) 34 4 36 4 32 6 35 5 31 9 38 2 39 1
5. For a random sample of 50 American cities, the linear correlation coefficient between the number...
5. For a random sample of 50 American cities, the linear correlation coefficient between the number of homocides last year and the number of schools in the city was found to be r = 0.653. a. What does this imply? b. Does this suggest that building more schools in a city could lead to higher levels of homocides? Why or why not? c. What is a likely lurking variable? 6. The data below are the first exam scores of 10...
Using the data from 15 automobile accidents, the correlation coefficient between the combined speeds of the...
Using the data from 15 automobile accidents, the correlation coefficient between the combined speeds of the cars (x) in an accident and the amount of damage done (y) is 0.7831. The regression equation for the two variables is y = 801.518 + 162.845x. a. Is this a significant correlation? b. If the answer to last part is YES, then predict the amount of damage done in an accident in which the combined speeds of the car involved was 100 mph.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT