Answer:
Three ways through which debt regime rules and restructuring of
social economies reversed development project in following
ways:
- Earlier taking debt for expanding the economies used to be
considered bad, but after debt regime rules and restructuring of
social economies taking debt to increase the growth rate to achieve
desired result much faster than earlier projected time is
considered better. And the same is being followed by most of the
developed countries be it US, China or Japan.
- As long as development rate is maintained these economies gets
debt at very low rates, and sometime to maintain the desired growth
they even take further loan to maintain the growth rate which may
be harmful in long run but shows desired result in short run.
- As this debt regime and restructuring is so much dependent on
growth and its increase in growth rate which justifies such a huge
debt that these countries need to show development even during the
phase of expansion or development where growth rate should subdue.
Earlier when debt regime was not there during expansion or
development phase growth rate use to be less and it used to
increase post development but now its always increasing due to debt
cycle, which may get burst if not shown as increasing.
(plz give me a thums up...if my answer helped you and if
any suggestion plz comment, Yr thums up boost me)