Question

Discuss and explain why deontological ethics, consequentialist ethics, and virtue ethics provide inadequate frameworks for a complete moral reasoning process.

Answer 1

Deontological ethics physically suggest a theory where the actions are good or bad and it is based on a clear set of rules of what is right and what is wrong this ethical theory can also be explain with the help of the some examples live do not kill do not steal do not cheat.
Because killing stealing and cheating all such related things also comes under the category of wrong there are certain rules which can easily explain the purpose of what is wrong and what is right.
Consequentialist ethics is basically a Theory which suggest and action whether it is good or bad it’s totally depending on its outcome it means whatever you are doing is good or bad is not exactly depend on the present situation but definitely it will depend on the result for the outcome.
Virtue ethics is basically an approach where the total focuses on individuals character means here individual character is the key element of of the thinking based on ethics.
Not is true that these ethical theories will provide an inadequate Framework for a complete moral reasoning process because moral reasoning is not depends on a particular ethical theories instead the based on the barriers ideologies and the functionalities which run on the basis of practical approach.