Question

In: Accounting

The Timberland Lumber Company had the following historical accounting data, per 100 board feet, concerning one...

The Timberland Lumber Company had the following historical accounting data, per 100 board feet, concerning one of its products in the Sawmill Division:

Finished shelving:

Direct materials

$30

Direct labor

16

Variable manufacturing overhead

8

Fixed manufacturing overhead

12

The historical data is based on an average volume per period of 20,000 board feet. The shelving is normally transferred internally from the Sawmill Division to the Finishing Division. Timberland may also sell the shelving externally for $90 per 100 board feet. The divisions are taxed at identical rates.

Which of the following transfer pricing methods would lead to the highest Finishing Division income if 10,000 board feet are produced and transferred in entirety this period from Sawmill to Finishing?

A. Market price

B. All variable costs plus 50% markup.

C. Full absorption costing plus 10% markup

D. None of these methods generates a higher division income than another.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Finishing Division Income would be highest when the transfer price is lowest from Sawmill Division to Finishing Division
Transfer prices under various methods will be as follows:
A.Market Price $90 per 100 board Feet
B.All Variable costs + 50% 81 per 100 board Feet
C.Full Absorption cost + 10% 72.6 per 100 board Feet
Hence, C. Full absorption costing plus 10% markup would generate highest income for finishing division


Related Solutions

Sell or Process Further Jackson Lumber Company incurs a cost of $398 per hundred board feet...
Sell or Process Further Jackson Lumber Company incurs a cost of $398 per hundred board feet (hbf) in processing certain "rough-cut" lumber, which it sells for $556 per hbf. An alternative is to produce a "finished cut" at a total processing cost of $528 per hbf, which can be sold for $754 per hbf. Prepare a differential analysis dated August 9 on whether to sell rough-cut lumber (Alternative 1) or process further into finished-cut lumber (Alternative 2). For those boxes...
Calgary Lumber Company incurs a cost of $460 per hundred board feet (hbf) in processing certain...
Calgary Lumber Company incurs a cost of $460 per hundred board feet (hbf) in processing certain “rough-cut” lumber, which it sells for $607 per hbf. An alternative is to produce a “finished cut” at a total processing cost of $543 per hbf, which can be sold for $725 per hbf. Required: 1. Prepare a differential analysis dated March 15 on whether to sell rough-cut lumber (Alternative 1) or process further into finished-cut lumber (Alternative 2). Refer to the Amount Descriptions...
Consider the yearly data of lumber production (in billions of board feet) in the United States...
Consider the yearly data of lumber production (in billions of board feet) in the United States given as follows: year production 1921 29 1922 35.2 1923 41 1924 39.5 1925 41 1926 39.8 1927 37.3 1928 36.8 1929 38.7 1930 29.4 1931 20 1932 13.5 1933 17.2 1934 18.8 1935 22.9 1936 27.6 1937 29 1938 24.8 1939 28.8 1940 31.2 1941 36.5 1942 36.3 1943 34.3 1944 32.9 1945 28.1 1946 34.1 1947 35.4 1948 37 1949 32.2 1950...
Panther Company had the following historical accounting data per unit: Direct materials $60 Direct labor 30...
Panther Company had the following historical accounting data per unit: Direct materials $60 Direct labor 30 Variable overhead 15 Fixed overhead 24 Variable selling expenses 45 Fixed selling expenses 9 The units are normally transferred internally from Division A to Division B. The units also may be sold externally for $210 per unit. The minimum profit level accepted by the company is a markup of 30 percent. There were no beginning or ending inventories. If the negotiated price is used,...
Per unit data concerning a product manufactured by XYZ Co. are given below: Selling price $100...
Per unit data concerning a product manufactured by XYZ Co. are given below: Selling price $100 Direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead 40 Fixed manufacturing overhead 25 Variable selling expense 10 Fixed selling and administrative expense 7 The above per unit data are based on annual production of 10,000 units. The company has received a special, one-time-only order for 500 units of the product with a selling price of $60. There would be no variable selling expense on...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity (in feet per second) of rounds fired from a...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity (in feet per second) of rounds fired from a 155-mm gun. For each round, two measurements of the velocity were recorded using two different measuring devices, resulting in the following data. Complete parts (a) through (d) below. Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 A 793.3, 791.7, 791.3, 791.4, 793.7, 790.1 B 803.1, 791.1, 800.9, 789.1, 795.2, 788.7 (b) Is there a difference in the measurements of the muzzle velocity between device A...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​ 155-mm gun. For each​ round, two measurements of the velocity were recorded using two different measuring​ devices, resulting in the following data. Complete parts​ (a) through​ (d) below. Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 A 790.4 791.9 794.6 794.2 794.1 793.8 B 796.1 787.0 803.4 792.6 794.8 791.0 a) Why are these​ matched-pairs data? A. Two measurements​ (A and​ B) are taken on...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​ 155-mm gun. For each​ round, two measurements of the velocity were recorded using two different measuring​ devices, resulting in the following data. Complete parts​ (a) through​ (d) below. Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 A 790.4 791.9 794.6 794.2 794.1 793.8 B 796.1 787.0 803.4 792.6 794.8 791.0 a) Why are these​ matched-pairs data? A. Two measurements​ (A and​ B) are taken on...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​ 155-mm gun. For each​ round, two measurements of the velocity were recorded using two different measuring​ devices, resulting in the following data. Complete parts​ (a) through​ (d) below. Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 Open in StatCrunch + Copy to Clipboard + Open in Excel + A 790.5790.5 793.9793.9 793.5793.5 790.7790.7 792.7792.7 794.3794.3 B 796.9796.9 792.0792.0 800.8800.8 789.6789.6 795.6795.6 792.8792.8 ​(a) Why are...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​...
The following data represent the muzzle velocity​ (in feet per​ second) of rounds fired from a​ 155-mm gun. For each​ round, two measurements of the velocity were recorded using two different measuring​ devices, resulting in the following data. Obervation 1 2 3 4 5 6 A 791.2 790.7 793.9 793.7 794.3 793.7 B 795.1 786.0 802.5 789.8 797.5 793.1 Is there a difference in the measurement of the muzzle velocity between device A and device B at the α=0.01 level...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT