Question

In: Math

Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive...

Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive patients who receive the following types of nonpharmacologic therapy:
Group 1:   Patients receive counseling for weight reduction
Group 2:   Patients receive counseling for meditation
Group 3:   Patients receive no counseling at all

The reduction in diastolic blood pressure is noted in these patients after a 1-month period and are given in the table below.
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
4.2 4.5 1.2
4.2 2.1 −0.3
3.4 2.3 0.6

2.8

Using the data above, we want to use Fisher's LSD method to test the following hyptheses at the 1% significance level:

H0 : μ1 = μ2  vs  HA : μ1μ2
H0 : μ1 = μ3  vs  HA : μ1μ3
H0 : μ2 = μ3  vs  HA : μ2μ3
(a) Find the value of LSD for each of the above three hypotheses (in the above order).
(b) Which pairs of means are significantly different (using Fisher's LSD test at the 1% significance level)?

(A) none of them (B) all of them (C) 1 and 2, 1 and 3 only (D) 1 and 2 only (E) 1 and 3 only (F) 1 and 2, 2 and 3 only (G) 2 and 3 only (H) 1 and 3, 2 and 3 only

Solutions

Expert Solution

(A)

Here the ANOVA table is given below

Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Group 1 3 11.8 3.933333 0.213333
Group 2 3 8.9 2.966667 1.773333
Group 3 4 4.3 1.075 1.7025
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 14.93917 2 7.469583 5.757961 0.033223 4.737414
Within Groups 9.080833 7 1.297262
Total 24.02 9

Here for the group 1 and group 2

the value of LSD is

Here dFW = 7 so

t0.025, 7 = 3.4995

LSD(1-2) = 3.4995 * sqrt [1.297262 * (1/3 + 1/3)] = 3.2544

LSD(1-3) = 3.4995 * sqrt [1.297262 * (1/3 + 1/4)] = 3.0442

LSD(2-3) =  3.4995 * sqrt [1.297262 * (1/3 + 1/4)] =3.0442

(b) Here mean difference between group 1 and group 2 = 3.93-2.9667 = 0.9667

which is less than LSD so there is no significant difference.

Here mean difference between group 1 and group 3 = 3.93- 1.075 = 2.5853

which is less than LSD so there is no a significant difference.

Here mean difference between group 2 and group 3 = 2.9667 - 1.075 =1.8917

which is less than LSD so there is not a significant difference.

None of them is significant


Related Solutions

Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive...
Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive patients who receive the following types of nonpharmacologic therapy: Group 1:   Patients receive counseling for weight reduction Group 2:   Patients receive counseling for meditation Group 3:   Patients receive no counseling at all The reduction in diastolic blood pressure is noted in these patients after a 1-month period and are given in the table below. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 4.2 4.5 1.2 5.4 2.3 −0.3 3.4...
Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive...
Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive patients who receive the following types of nonpharmacologic therapy: Group 1:   Patients receive counseling for weight reduction Group 2:   Patients receive counseling for meditation Group 3:   Patients receive no counseling at all The reduction in diastolic blood pressure is noted in these patients after a 1-month period and are given in the table below. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 4.2 4.5 1.2 5.4 2.3 −0.3 3.4...
Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive...
Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive patients who receive the following types of nonpharmacologic therapy: Group 1:   Patients receive counseling for weight reduction Group 2:   Patients receive counseling for meditation Group 3:   Patients receive no counseling at all The reduction in diastolic blood pressure is noted in these patients after a 1-month period and are given in the table below. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 4.2 4.5 1.2 5.3 2.2 −0.3 3.4...
Problem 1: Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups...
Problem 1: Strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods are compared by establishing three groups of hypertensive patients who receive the following types of nonpharmacologic therapy: Group 1:   Patients receive counseling for weight reduction Group 2:   Patients receive counseling for meditation Group 3:   Patients receive no counseling at all The reduction in diastolic blood pressure is noted in these patients after a 1-month period and are given in the table below. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 4.2 4.5 1.2 6.4 2.3...
Some common strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods include (1) weight reduction and (2)...
Some common strategies for treating hypertensive patients by nonpharmacologic methods include (1) weight reduction and (2) trying to get the patient to relax more by meditational or other techniques. These strategies were evaluated by randomizing hypertensive patients to four groups who receive the following types of nonpharmacologic therapy: Group 1: patients receive counselling for both weight reduction and meditation. Group 2: patients receive counselling for weight reduction but not for meditation. Group 3: patients receive counselling for meditation but not...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of instruction are called Basal, DRTA, and Strategies. As is common in such studies, several pretest variables were measured before any instruction was given. One purpose of the pretest was to see if the three groups of children were similar in their comprehension skills. The READINGdata set described in the Data Appendix gives two pretest measures that were used in this study. Use one-way ANOVA...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of instruction are called Basal, DRTA, and Strategies. Basal is the traditional method of teaching, while DRTA and Strategies are two innovative methods based on similar theoretical considerations. The READING data set includes three response variables that the new methods were designed to improve. Analyze these variables using ANOVA methods. Be sure to include multiple comparisons or contrasts as needed. Write a report summarizing your...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of instruction are called Basal, DRTA, and Strategies. As is common in such studies, several pretest variables were measured before any instruction was given. One purpose of the pretest was to see if the three groups of children were similar in their comprehension skills. The READING data set described in the Data Appendix gives two pretest measures that were used in this study. Use one-way...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of instruction are called Basal, DRTA, and Strategies. As is common in such studies, several pretest variables were measured before any instruction was given. One purpose of the pretest was to see if the three groups of children were similar in their comprehension skills. The READING data set described in the Data Appendix gives two pretest measures that were used in this study. Use one-way...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of...
A study of reading comprehension in children compared three methods of instruction. The three methods of instruction are called Basal, DRTA, and Strategies. Basal is the traditional method of teaching, while DRTA and Strategies are two innovative methods based on similar theoretical considerations. The READING data set includes three response variables that the new methods were designed to improve. Analyze these variables using ANOVA methods. Be sure to include multiple comparisons or contrasts as needed. Write a report summarizing your...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT