Question

Within the past two decades, positive psychology and humanistic psychology have been at odds over their philosophical foundations and approaches to human well-being. Briefly discuss the historic development of positive psychology and humanistic psychology.

Answer 1

Martin Seligman is a pioneer of Positive Psychology (the term itself was instituted by Abraham Maslow), not just on the grounds that he has an orderly hypothesis regarding why upbeat individuals are glad, but since he utilizes the logical strategy to investigate it. Using thorough surveys, Seligman found that the most fulfilled, cheery individuals were the individuals who had found and misused their one of a kind mix of "signature qualities, for example, humankind, balance and steadiness. This vision of joy consolidates the uprightness morals of Confucius, Mencius and Aristotle with current mental speculations of inspiration. Seligman's decision is that satisfaction has three measurements that can be developed: the Pleasant Life, the Good Life, and the Meaningful Life.

The Pleasant Life is acknowledged whether we figure out how to relish and acknowledge such essential joys as camaraderie, the indigenous habitat and our real needs. We can remain agreeably stuck at this stage or we can proceed to encounter the Good Life, which is accomplished through finding our one of a kind temperances and qualities, and utilizing them inventively to improve our lives. As per current hypotheses of confidence life is possibly really fulfilling on the off chance that we find an incentive inside ourselves. However perhaps the most ideal methods for finding this worth is by sustaining our exceptional qualities in adding to the bliss of our kindred people. Thus the last stage is the Meaningful Life, in which we locate a profound feeling of satisfaction by utilizing our one of a kind qualities for a reason more prominent than ourselves. The virtuoso of Seligman's hypothesis is that it accommodates two clashing perspectives on human bliss, the individualistic methodology, which accentuates that we should deal with ourselves and support our very own qualities, and the selfless methodology, which will in general minimize uniqueness and underlines penance for the more noteworthy reason.

Psychology has usually underscored the weaknesses of people as contrasted and their possibilities. This specific methodology centers around the possibilities. It isn't focused at fixing issues, yet is centered around inquiring about things that make life worth living. In short, positive psychology is concerned not with how to change, for instance, - 8 to - 2 yet with how to bring +2 to +8.

This direction in psychology was set up around ten years prior and it is a quickly creating field. Its yearning is to bring strong observational examination into regions, for example, prosperity, stream, individual qualities, astuteness, imagination, mental wellbeing and attributes of positive gatherings and establishments. The guide on the following page demonstrates the themes of enthusiasm for positive clinicians.

The study of positive brain science works on three unique levels – the abstract level, the individual level and the gathering level.

The emotional level incorporates the investigation of positive encounters, for example, euphoria, prosperity, fulfillment, satisfaction, happiness, optimism and stream. This level is tied in with feeling better, as opposed to doing great or being a decent individual.

Positive psychology is concerned with eudaimonia, "The great life", reflection about what holds the best an incentive throughout everyday life – the components that contribute the most to a well-lived and satisfying life.

Positive psychologists have proposed various manners by which individual bliss might be encouraged. or social associations are of specific significance, while physical exercise and the act of reflection may likewise add to satisfaction. Joy may ascend with expanding money related salary, however it might level or even fall when no further gains are made.

At the following level, the point is to distinguish the constituents of the 'great life' and the individual characteristics that are vital for being a 'decent individual', through examining human strengths and temperances, future-mindedness, limit with respect to adore, boldness, constancy, pardoning, innovation, astuteness, relational aptitudes and skill.

At last, at the gathering or network level, the accentuation is on municipal temperances, social duties, nurturance, philanthropy, class, resistance, hard working attitudes, positive establishments and different variables that add to the improvement of citizenship and networks.