Question

In: Statistics and Probability

MANUF POP 213 582 91 132 453 716 454 515 412 158 80 80 434 757...

MANUF POP
213 582
91 132
453 716
454 515
412 158
80 80
434 757
136 529
207 335
368 497
3344 3369
361 746
104 201
125 277
291 593
204 361
625 905
1064 1513
699 744
381 507
775 622
181 347
46 244
44 116
391 463
462 453
1007 751
266 540
1692 1950
347 520
343 179
337 624
275 448
641 844
721 1233
137 176
96 308
197 299
379 531
35 71
569 717

It is commonly believed that cities with population of 500 and higher have on average higher manufacturing than the cities with population of less than 500. Use Pollution data and your statistical expertise to answer the questions: Is this a reasonable belief?

4. What test/procedure did you perform?

  • a. One-sided t-test
  • b. Two-sided t-test
  • c. Regression
  • d. ​​Confidence interval

5. Statistical Interpretation

  • a. Since P-value is small we are confident that the slope is not zero.
  • b. Since P-value is small we are confident that the averages are different.
  • c. Since P-value is too large the test is inconclusive.
  • d. ​​None of these.

6. Conclusion

  • a. Yes, I am confident that the above belief is correct.
  • b. No, I cannot claim that the above belief is correct.

Task 1

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:

Here, we have to use two sample t test for population means assuming equal population variances.

Null hypothesis: H0: Cities with population of 500 and higher have same manufacturing as the cities with population of less than 500.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: Cities with population of 500 and higher have on average higher manufacturing than the cities with population of less than 500.

H0: µ1 = µ2 versus Ha: µ1 > µ2

This is an upper tailed (one tailed) test.

µ1 = Average manufacturing of cities with population with 500 or more.

µ2 = Average manufacturing of cities with population less than 500

Test statistic formula for pooled variance t test is given as below:

t = (X1bar – X2bar) / sqrt[Sp2*((1/n1)+(1/n2))]

Where Sp2 is pooled variance

Sp2 = [(n1 – 1)*S1^2 + (n2 – 1)*S2^2]/(n1 + n2 – 2)

We are given

X1bar = 690.4090909

X2bar = 199.8947368

S1 = 686.992733

S2 = 136.623121

n1 = 22

n2 = 19

df = n1 + n2 – 2 = 22 + 19 – 2 = 39

α = 0.05

Critical t value = 1.6849

(by using t-table)

Sp2 = [(n1 – 1)*S1^2 + (n2 – 1)*S2^2]/(n1 + n2 – 2)

Sp2 = [(22 – 1)* 686.992733^2 + (19 – 1)* 136.623121^2]/(22 + 19 – 2)

Sp2 = 262746.7976

t = (X1bar – X2bar) / sqrt[Sp2*((1/n1)+(1/n2))]

t = (690.4090909 – 199.8947368) / sqrt[262746.7976*((1/22)+(1/19))]

t = 490.5144 / 160.5360

t = 3.0555

P-value = 0.0020

(by using t-table)

P-value < α = 0.05

So, we reject the null hypothesis

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Cities with population of 500 and higher have on average higher manufacturing than the cities with population of less than 500.

4. What test/procedure did you perform?

Answer: a. One-sided t test

5. Statistical Interpretation

Answer: d. ​​None of these.

6. Conclusion

Answer: a. Yes, I am confident that the above belief is correct.


Related Solutions

CITY SO2 POP Phoenix 11 582 Little Rock 15 132 San Francisco 16 716 Denver 24...
CITY SO2 POP Phoenix 11 582 Little Rock 15 132 San Francisco 16 716 Denver 24 515 Hartford 82 158 Wilmington 43 80 Washington 30 757 Jacksonville 18 529 Miami 14 335 Atlanta 32 497 Chicago 131 3369 Indianapolis 40 746 Des Moines 20 201 Wichita 10 277 Louisville 35 593 New Orleans 9 361 Baltimore 47 905 Detroit 46 1513 Minneapolis-St. Paul 42 744 Kansas City 18 507 St. Louis 61 622 Omaha 17 347 Albuquerque 15 244 Albany...
CITY SO2 MANUF POP TEMP WIND PRECIP-INCHES PRECIP-#DAYS Phoenix 11 213 582 70.3 6 7.05 36...
CITY SO2 MANUF POP TEMP WIND PRECIP-INCHES PRECIP-#DAYS Phoenix 11 213 582 70.3 6 7.05 36 Little Rock 15 91 132 61 8.2 48.52 100 San Francisco 16 453 716 56.7 8.7 20.66 67 Denver 24 454 515 51.9 9 12.95 86 Hartford 82 412 158 49.1 9 43.37 127 Wilmington 43 80 80 54 9 40.25 114 Washington 30 434 757 57.3 9.3 38.89 111 Jacksonville 18 136 529 68.4 8.8 54.47 116 Miami 14 207 335 75.5 9...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT