Question

compare and contrast autocratic leadership and democratic leadership styles and the effect each style of leadership has on an organization and team positive and negative

Answer 1

Autocratic leadership

Autocratic leadership or authoritarian leadership refers to a person who demonstrates control over all decisions taking little to no input from other groups or individuals.

They make resolutions out of their judgments,ideas and beliefs.

An autocratic leader is someone who can be like a dictator.they usually instill fear and control to gain power over people.

Autocratic leadership has only one person that has the authority to make decisions and takes very little to no inputs from other groups.

Democratic leadership styles

Democratic leadership also known as participative leadership or shared leadership is a type of leadership style in which members of the group take a more participative role in the decision making process.this type of leadership can apply to any organization from private businesses to schools to government.

* everyone is given the opportunity to participate ideas are exchanged freely, and discussion is encouraged.

Autocratic leadership , here are the benefits of an autocratic leader.Quick decision making skills.those who are autocratic leaders often have exceptional decision making abilities.this is especially important in high stress situations where a resolution needs to be established immediately .

The negative effects of autocratic leadership make it the least popular leadership style.to begin with the subordinate members of the group tend to develop resentment for the leader because they feel as if they have no say in the making of decisions.

Managers who adopt a Democratic style encourage idea sharing and regular employee participation.the focus is on encouraging your team to share their thoughts,ideas,suggestions, and potential solutions in order to help each other and the company grows.

Although effective Democratic leadership style has certain disadvantages.when roles are not clearly defined and time is limited this leadership style can lead to failures.further in some cases members of the group might lack the expertise and knowledge to contribute towards decision making.