Question

5. What does Kant mean by "Thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind?" Do you agree that at least some of your perceptions are conceptualized?

please give me a convincing answer. A paragraph with 5-6 sentences.

Answer 1

Below is an absolutely accurate answer.

Kant means-

Thoughts without content are empty intuitions without ideas are visually impaired. It is, along those lines, further as crucial to make our thoughts reasonable, this is, to add the object to them in instinct, as to make our instincts coherent, that is, to carry them under ideas.

Part 2)

Yes, I do agree with the perceptions of conceptualization.

Kantian concept is famously unpredictable, yet it's miles gotten from truthful standards, for example, the two added here.

-The concept that musings with out content material are unfilled is probably considered as a redundancy, just worth expressing unequivocally as a venturing stone to some more and more tough recommendation. In reality, it's far clear that some thing without content material is vacant, on the grounds that that is the aspect that "vacant" signifies. Unadulterated concept is unthinkable, for the reason that thought should be about something.

-This factor can be conceptual (equity, truth, magnificence) or solid (trees, blossoms, structures), yet there need to be substance or the like. Regardless of whether you are thinking of nothing, you are considering the opportunity of nothing