Question

In: Computer Science

Closure under Context-Free Languages Show that the following operations are closed under context-free languages: union concatentation...

Closure under Context-Free Languages

Show that the following operations are closed under context-free languages:

  • union

  • concatentation

  • Kleene star

Solutions

Expert Solution

Figure shows the proof of properties of context free language.

venereology answered 1 year ago
Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Prove the following Closure Properties with respect to Context Free Languages. 1. Show that Context Free...
Prove the following Closure Properties with respect to Context Free Languages. 1. Show that Context Free Languages are Closed under union(∪), concatenation(·), kleene star(*). (Hint: If L1 and L2 are Context Free languages then write Context Free grammar equivalent to L1 ∪ L2, L1 · L2, L∗ 1 ) 2. Show that if L1 and L2 are Context Free Languages, then L1 ∩ L2 is not necessarily Context Free. (Hint: Use Proof by Counter Example)
Show that Turing-decidable languages are closed under the following operations: union concatenation star Show that Turing-recognizable...
Show that Turing-decidable languages are closed under the following operations: union concatenation star Show that Turing-recognizable languages are closed under the following operations: union concatenation star Each answer needs only be a short informal description of a Turing Machine (but it must still be sufficiently precise so someone could reconstruct a formal machine if needed).
(a) How Context Free languages are different from Regular languages. (b) What are the automata accepting...
(a) How Context Free languages are different from Regular languages. (b) What are the automata accepting those languages and how they are different from DFA and NFA. (c) How the grammar of Context Free Languages looks different from those in Regular languages.
Consider two languages A and B where A is a context free language and B is...
Consider two languages A and B where A is a context free language and B is a regular language. Show that the set difference, A-B, must also be context free. Also show that B-A may not be context free
Prove that all regular languages are context free. Note: Proof must proceed by structural induction on...
Prove that all regular languages are context free. Note: Proof must proceed by structural induction on regular expressions Please prove by Structural Induction. Will Upvote for correct answer. Thanks
Give context free grammars for the languages below. To avoid mistakes, I recommend using scratch paper...
Give context free grammars for the languages below. To avoid mistakes, I recommend using scratch paper to check that your grammars produce the right set of string. This question is structured so that nonterminals (and associated rules) from an earlier subquestion might be useful in a grammar for a later sub-question. That’s why, rather than “S” as the start symbol, we will used different start symbols for each part. If you do use a nonterminal from an earlier sub-question, say...
Give context free grammars for the languages below. To avoid mistakes, I recommend using scratch paper...
Give context free grammars for the languages below. To avoid mistakes, I recommend using scratch paper to check that your grammars produce the right set of string. This question is structured so that nonterminals (and associated rules) from an earlier subquestion might be useful in a grammar for a later sub-question. That’s why, rather than “S” as the start symbol, we will used different start symbols for each part. If you do use a nonterminal from an earlier sub-question, say...
Show that L2 = {anb2nan : n ≥ 0} is not context-free using the pumping lemma.
Show that L2 = {anb2nan : n ≥ 0} is not context-free using the pumping lemma.
Use the Pumping Lemma to show that the following languages are not regular. (a) {ai bj...
Use the Pumping Lemma to show that the following languages are not regular. (a) {ai bj | i > j} (b) {apaq | for all integers p and q where q is a prime number and p is not prime}.
Let G be any context-free grammar. Show that the number of strings that have a derivation...
Let G be any context-free grammar. Show that the number of strings that have a derivation in G of length n or less, for any n > 0, is finite. Could you please answer with clear explanation. The question is from Elaine Rich's Automata, Computability and Complexity Chapter 11 Exercise 14.
ADVERTISEMENT
Subjects
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Questions
ADVERTISEMENT