In: Operations Management
Yield | Constant | Time | Method |
---|---|---|---|
54.6 | 1 | 16 | 0 |
45.8 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
57.4 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
40.1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
56.3 | 1 | 20 | 0 |
51.5 | 1 | 18 | 0 |
50.7 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
64.5 | 1 | 15 | 0 |
52.6 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
48.6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
74.9 | 1 | 12 | 1 |
78.3 | 1 | 19 | 1 |
80.4 | 1 | 14 | 1 |
58.7 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
68.1 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
64.7 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
66.5 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
73.5 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
81 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
73.7 | 1 | 13 | 1 |
1. Regress Yield = f(Method)
2. Sort the Data. Redo 1. Compare results.
3. Regress Yield = f(Method, Time) What is your understanding of time? Compare results with 1 and 2.
4. Regress Time = f(Method) What does this model measure?
Q1. Regress Yield = f(Method)
Regression Statistics |
||
Multiple R |
0.82970177 |
|
R Square |
0.688405027 |
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.671094196 |
|
Standard Error |
7.010171182 |
|
Observations |
20 |
|
Residual Output |
||
Observation |
Predicted Y |
Residuals |
1 |
52.21 |
2.39 |
2 |
52.21 |
-6.41 |
3 |
52.21 |
5.19 |
4 |
52.21 |
-12.11 |
5 |
52.21 |
4.09 |
6 |
52.21 |
-0.71 |
7 |
52.21 |
-1.51 |
8 |
52.21 |
12.29 |
9 |
52.21 |
0.39 |
10 |
52.21 |
-3.61 |
11 |
71.98 |
2.92 |
12 |
71.98 |
6.32 |
13 |
71.98 |
8.42 |
14 |
71.98 |
-13.28 |
15 |
71.98 |
-3.88 |
16 |
71.98 |
-7.28 |
17 |
71.98 |
-5.48 |
18 |
71.98 |
1.52 |
19 |
71.98 |
9.02 |
20 |
71.98 |
1.72 |
Regression of Yield using Method has a R-Square value of .688, which means 68.8% of the variance of Yield is explained by Method itself.
While analyzing the residuals, it can be observed that the predicted Yield has only 2 kinds of values: - 52.21 and 71.98 and this depends on the type of method selected (0 or 1). Since method is acting as a binary variable here, so the predicted value of yield is also limited to 2 states only.
Q2. Sort the Data. Redo 1. Compare results
Regression Statistics |
||
Multiple R |
0.82970177 |
|
R Square |
0.688405027 |
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.671094196 |
|
Standard Error |
7.010171182 |
|
Observations |
20 |
|
Residual Output |
||
Observation |
Predicted Y |
Residuals |
1 |
52.21 |
2.39 |
2 |
52.21 |
-6.41 |
3 |
52.21 |
5.19 |
4 |
52.21 |
-12.11 |
5 |
52.21 |
4.09 |
6 |
52.21 |
-0.71 |
7 |
52.21 |
-1.51 |
8 |
52.21 |
12.29 |
9 |
52.21 |
0.39 |
10 |
52.21 |
-3.61 |
11 |
71.98 |
2.92 |
12 |
71.98 |
6.32 |
13 |
71.98 |
8.42 |
14 |
71.98 |
-13.28 |
15 |
71.98 |
-3.88 |
16 |
71.98 |
-7.28 |
17 |
71.98 |
-5.48 |
18 |
71.98 |
1.52 |
19 |
71.98 |
9.02 |
20 |
71.98 |
1.72 |
Sorting the values do not affect the regression model as regression don’t depend on the order of the input data, rather it depends only on the values of the input variable (independent variable) and its effect on the output variable (dependent variable)
Q3. Regress Yield = f(Method, Time) What is your understanding of time? Compare results with 1 and 2.
Regression Statistics |
||
Multiple R |
0.909929 |
|
R Square |
0.827971 |
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.807732 |
|
Standard Error |
5.359768 |
|
Observations |
20 |
|
Residual Output |
||
Observation |
Predicted Y |
Residuals |
1 |
45.49062 |
-5.39062 |
2 |
51.66936 |
-5.86936 |
3 |
47.80765 |
0.792353 |
4 |
50.89702 |
-0.19702 |
5 |
57.8481 |
-6.3481 |
6 |
44.71828 |
7.881724 |
7 |
56.30342 |
-1.70342 |
8 |
59.39279 |
-3.09279 |
9 |
52.4417 |
4.958297 |
10 |
68.65893 |
-9.95893 |
11 |
55.53107 |
8.968927 |
12 |
66.3419 |
-1.6419 |
13 |
69.43127 |
-2.93127 |
14 |
70.20361 |
-2.10361 |
15 |
67.11424 |
6.385759 |
16 |
74.06533 |
-0.36533 |
17 |
73.29298 |
1.607017 |
18 |
78.69938 |
-0.39938 |
19 |
74.83767 |
5.562332 |
20 |
77.1547 |
3.845304 |
When we regressed Yield with both method and time, the R-square value jumped to .827, i.e., now 82.7% of the variation in the model can be explained by the 2 independent variables (Method and Time).
Analyzing the residuals also suggests that predicted Yield values are dynamic and since it depends on one binary variable (Method) and a continuous variables (Time), the Yield values are continuous in nature
Time is basically the length of period for which a person remains invested and it is visible that with the increase in time, Yield increases accordingly.
Q4. Regress Time = f(Method) What does this model measure?
Regression Statistics |
||
Multiple R |
0.034684 |
|
R Square |
0.001203 |
|
Adjusted R Square |
-0.05429 |
|
Standard Error |
6.074537 |
|
Observations |
20 |
|
Residual Output |
||
Observation |
Predicted Y |
Residuals |
1 |
10.7 |
-8.7 |
2 |
10.7 |
-0.7 |
3 |
10.7 |
-5.7 |
4 |
10.7 |
-1.7 |
5 |
10.7 |
7.3 |
6 |
10.7 |
-9.7 |
7 |
10.7 |
5.3 |
8 |
10.7 |
9.3 |
9 |
10.7 |
0.3 |
10 |
10.3 |
-4.3 |
11 |
10.7 |
4.3 |
12 |
10.3 |
-7.3 |
13 |
10.3 |
-3.3 |
14 |
10.3 |
-2.3 |
15 |
10.3 |
-6.3 |
16 |
10.3 |
2.7 |
17 |
10.3 |
1.7 |
18 |
10.3 |
8.7 |
19 |
10.3 |
3.7 |
20 |
10.3 |
6.7 |
Regressing time and method is not giving a very insightful or useful model. With a meagre R-squared value of .0012, it is basically calculating the average of the independent variable (method) to predict the dependent variable (time). The penalty of regressing these 2 variables is actually pulling the adjusted R-Square to negative.