Question

In: Finance

Corner Jewelers, Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the...

Corner Jewelers, Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the company decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve changed interest rates and therefore the firm's cost of capital (r). The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the r affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's expected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected.

Old r. 8.00% New r. 11.25%
Year

0

1

2

3

Cash flows

−$1,000

$410

$410

$410

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution :

NPV of the project at old rate of Cost of capital of 8 % = $ 56.61

NPV of the project at new rate of Cost of Capital of 11.25 % = - $ 2.42

Thus the Change in the project's forecasted NPV due to change in the rate of cost of capital is

= NPV at New Rate Less : NPV at Old Rate

= - $ 2.42 - $ 56.61

= - $ 59.03

Thus there is a decrease in the Project's forecasted NPV at the new rate by - $ 59.03 when compared to the NPV at the old rate.

The Project at the new rate of cost of capital should be rejected as its NPV is negative.

Please find the attached screenshot of the excel sheet containing the detailed calculation for the above solution.


Related Solutions

Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik...
Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. Old WACC: 8.00%...
Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik...
Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. Old WACC: 8.00%...
FMA Co. analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to...
FMA Co. analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's interest rate. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the interest rate affect the project's forecasted NPV? Should the project be accepted? Old interest rate: 10.00% New interest rate: 12% Year 0 1 2 3 Cash...
Last month, Lloyd's Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the...
Last month, Lloyd's Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. Old WACC:  10.00%              New WACC:...
Last month, Durmus Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the...
Last month, Durmus Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Old WACC: 9.00% New WACC: 9.25% Year 0 1 2 3 Cash flows -$1,000 $710 $610 $310
- Langton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
- Langton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone? In other words, what's the NPV of the chosen project...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100...
Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone. In other words, what's the NPV of the chosen project...
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost WACC 11.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFs...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT