Question

In: Finance

Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik...

Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected.

Old WACC: 8.00% New WACC: 9.75%
Year 0 1 2 3
Cash flows -$1,000 $410 $410 $410
a. -$34.12
b. -$32.50
c. -$28.60
d. -$30.55
e. -$29.25

Solutions

Expert Solution

Net Present Value of the Project at Old WACC of 8.00%

Year

Annual cash flows ($)

Present Value Factor (PVF) at 8.00%

Present Value of annual cash flows ($)

[Annual cash flow x PVF]

1

410

0.92593

379.63

2

410

0.85734

351.51

3

410

0.79383

325.47

TOTAL

1,056.61

Net Present Value (NPV) = Present Value of annual cash inflows – Initial Investment

= $1,056.61 - $1,000

= $56.61

Net Present Value of the Project at New WACC of 8.00%

Year

Annual cash flows ($)

Present Value Factor (PVF) at 9.75%

Present Value of annual cash flows ($)

[Annual cash flow x PVF]

1

410

0.91116

373.58

2

410

0.83022

340.39

3

410

0.75646

310.15

TOTAL

1,024.11

Net Present Value (NPV) = Present Value of annual cash inflows – Initial Investment

= $1,024.11 - $1,000

= $24.11

Change in Projects NPV

Change in Projects NPV = NPV at New WACC – NPV at Old WACC

= $24.11 - $56.61

= -$32.50 (Negative)

Therefore, the Change in Projects NPV is (b). -$32.50

NOTE    

The Formula for calculating the Present Value Factor is [1/(1 + r)n], Where “r” is the Discount/Interest Rate and “n” is the number of years.


Related Solutions

Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik...
Lasik Vision Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before Lasik decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. Old WACC: 8.00%...
Corner Jewelers, Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the...
Corner Jewelers, Inc. recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the company decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve changed interest rates and therefore the firm's cost of capital (r). The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the r affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's expected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. Old r....
FMA Co. analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to...
FMA Co. analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's interest rate. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the interest rate affect the project's forecasted NPV? Should the project be accepted? Old interest rate: 10.00% New interest rate: 12% Year 0 1 2 3 Cash...
Last month, Lloyd's Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the...
Last month, Lloyd's Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. Old WACC:  10.00%              New WACC:...
Last month, Durmus Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the...
Last month, Durmus Systems analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Old WACC: 9.00% New WACC: 9.25% Year 0 1 2 3 Cash flows -$1,000 $710 $610 $310
- Langton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
- Langton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone? In other words, what's the NPV of the chosen project...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100...
Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone. In other words, what's the NPV of the chosen project...
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost WACC 11.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFs...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT