Question

In: Biology

Consider a new virus that causes a life-threatening disease. Two individuals are exposed to high amounts...

Consider a new virus that causes a life-threatening disease. Two individuals are exposed to high amounts of virus and only one develops disease. Personalized medicine approaches determine that the individual that was “resistant” to the virus carried a mutation in the gene encoding surface protein X. From this information and your knowledge gained in MIBO3500, what is (are) the reasonable hypothesis(es).

Question 16 options:

A)

The “resistant” individual has a stronger immune system than the other individual

B)

The correlation between surface protein X and disease is accidental

C)

Surface protein X causes the infection

D)

Surface protein X is the receptor for the virus

E)

A or D

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer: Option( D) - Surface protein X is the receptor for the virus.

Explanation : As the question said the individual who was resistant to the virus, carried a mutation in the gene encoding surface protein X, it may be hypothesised that the virus entry to the cell is mediated by this surface protein X. Also the surface protein X may be the receptor for the virus.

The individual who had no mutation for that gene, allowed virus entry so got the infection.

Option (A) is not right as in this scenario the person who had the mutation in the gene encoding surface protein X was resistant to the virus even after being exposed to a high amount of virus. The other individual got the disease. We can't hypothesise about the resistant individual's immune system being stronger than the non - resistant individual based on these data as the resistance is shown to be mediated by a mutation but not by the immune system.

Option (B) is not right because personalised medicine approach has indicated a more or less definite correlation between the surface protein X and the disease occurance. It is to be noted that the individual who had the mutation in the gene coding for protein X was resistant and the other individual without the mutation was sensitive to the virus. Therefore it can not be hypothesised that the relationship between protein X and the disease is accidental.

Option (C) is not the right answer as the cause of the infection is virus not the surface protein X. The individual who had normal (without mutation) surface protein X got the disease after being exposed to high amount of virus. So, it is clear that protein X doesn't cause the disease. It may serve as a receptor for the virus to enter into the cell( by observing the case with both individuals).

Option (E) is not the right option as Option (D) may be the reasonable hypothesis but the hypothesis in option (A) is not right.


Related Solutions

Consider a disease with an exposed class that is also infectious. Individuals move from the susceptible...
Consider a disease with an exposed class that is also infectious. Individuals move from the susceptible to the exposed class at rate βSI + αSE, where β is the transmission rate of the I class and α is the transmission rate of the E class. Individuals from the E class move into the I class at rate δE. Individuals in the I class recover at rate γI. We will assume that removed individuals are immune and that the total population...
Septicemia is a serious bloodstream infection, can quickly become life-threatening. Describe the causes, pathogenies, epidemiology, signs...
Septicemia is a serious bloodstream infection, can quickly become life-threatening. Describe the causes, pathogenies, epidemiology, signs and symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Include how it can be prevented.
Septicemia is a serious bloodstream infection, can quickly become life-threatening. Describe the causes, pathogenies, epidemiology, signs...
Septicemia is a serious bloodstream infection, can quickly become life-threatening. Describe the causes, pathogenies, epidemiology, signs and symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Include how it can be prevented. NOT bullet points, paragraph form please!
Describe the two different disease manifestations of Varicella-Zoster virus.
Describe the two different disease manifestations of Varicella-Zoster virus.
Jesse is interested in testing whether virus X causes disease in tomato plants. Her experimental design...
Jesse is interested in testing whether virus X causes disease in tomato plants. Her experimental design is to infect tomato plants from the green house with virus X and monitor for disease symptoms after 3 days, 1 week and 2 weeks. As a control Jesse will also monitor the tomato plants in her home garden, which she did not infect with virus X, at 3 days, 1 week and 2 weeks. Is this an appropriate control sample for Jesse’s experiment?...
A recent study by the Center for Disease Control claims that a new super-contagious virus will...
A recent study by the Center for Disease Control claims that a new super-contagious virus will impact a population in which it is found if left unchecked. A recent occurrence of this virus happened on an very isolated island nation with over 30,000 inhabitants. In randomly testing 400 residents of this island after the virus outbreak, a research team found 330 tested positive for having been infected by the virus.                    What was the sample's proportion measure of those having...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive tests. Researchers have developed a shorter test called the 7-Minute Screen. A study using the same participants evaluated whether scores from the 7-Minute Screen could predict scores from a series of cognitive tests for Alzheimer’s disease. Participant 7-minute Screen Cognitive Series 1 3 11 2 8 19 3 10 22 4 8 20 5 4 14 6 7 13 7 4 9 8 5...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive tests. However, researchers have developed a 7-Minute Screen, which is a quick and easy way to accomplish the same goal. The question is whether the 7-Minute Screen is as effective as the complete series of tests. To address this question, Ijuin et al. (2008) administered both tests to a group of patients and compared the results. The following data represent results similar to those...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive tests. However, researchers have developed a 7-Minute Screen, which is a quick and easy way to accomplish the same goal. The question is whether the 7-Minute Screen is as effective as the complete series of tests. To address this question, Ijuin et al. (2008) administered both tests to a group of patients and compared the results. The following data represent results similar to those...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive...
Identifying individuals with a high risk of Alzheimer’s disease usually involves a long series of cognitive tests. However, researchers have developed a 7-Minute Screen, which is a quick and easy way to accomplish the same goal. The question is whether the 7-Minute Screen is as effective as the complete series of tests. To address this question, Ijuin et al. (2008) administered both tests to a group of patients and compared the results. The following data represent results similar to those...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT